Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
VirnetX Inc. et al v. Apple Inc.
Case Number:
6:12-cv-00855
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Ahmad Zavitsanos
- Bruster PLLC
- Buss & Benefield
- Caldwell Cassady
- Charhon Callahan
- Cherian LLP
- Cohen Ziffer
- Desmarais LLP
- Jackson Walker LLP
- Kirkland & Ellis
- McKool Smith
- Orrick Herrington
- Parker Bunt
- Perkins Coie
- Potter Minton
- Robins Kaplan
- Skiermont Derby
- Ward Smith
- Williams Morgan
- WilmerHale
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 21, 2021
Apple, VirnetX Agree On $75.6M In Interest After $503M Award
While Apple may appeal a Texas federal judge's order granting VirnetX Inc. costs and prejudgment interest on top of the $503 million patent trial verdict, it agrees that the amount of such costs and prejudgment interest, using the court's methodology, would total $75.6 million, VirnetX said Wednesday.
-
January 15, 2021
Apple-VirnetX Judge Explains Why He Won't Grant New Trial
A Texas federal judge made public on Friday his reasons for not granting Apple Inc. a redo over its $503 million patent trial loss to VirnetX Inc., saying among other things that VirnetX's closing arguments didn't unduly push the jury to "punish" its tech giant rival.
-
January 06, 2021
Apple Can't Get New Trial After $503M VirnetX Patent Verdict
A Texas federal judge on Wednesday denied Apple Inc.'s motion for a new trial after a jury found in October that it should pay $502.8 million for infringing VirnetX Inc.'s network security patents, according to an opinion that was filed under seal except for a one-page order.
-
December 17, 2020
Apple Attacks VirnetX's Trial Strategy In $503M Patent Verdict
Apple asked a Texas federal judge Thursday to reduce a $502.8 million jury verdict for VirnetX in a network security patent case, arguing VirnetX introduced evidence at trial of other licensing agreements that didn't involve comparable technology, causing the jury to award an inflated royalty price per device.
-
December 08, 2020
VirnetX Fights Apple Bid For Redo Of $503M Patent Verdict
VirnetX has urged a Texas federal judge to ignore Apple's request to either override a $502.8 million jury verdict or order a new trial in a network security patent case, saying the tech giant was using "recycled" arguments.
-
November 20, 2020
Apple Seeks Redo After VirnetX's 'Outsized' $503M Patent Win
Apple Inc. has urged a Texas federal judge to either override a $502.8 million jury verdict for infringing VirnetX's network security patents or order a new trial, arguing that no reasonable jury could have awarded such "outsized" damages.
-
November 12, 2020
Citing Virus, Apple Wants Remote Wrap-Up Of $503M Verdict
Apple Inc. is asking a Texas federal judge to conduct a post-trial hearing by phone after a jury slammed it with a $502.8 million verdict for infringing VirnetX Inc.'s network security patents, citing "hardship" the company's attorneys would face due to the coronavirus pandemic.
-
October 30, 2020
Apple Hit With $503M Verdict In VirnetX Patent Retrial
An Eastern District of Texas jury said Friday that Apple should pay $502.8 million for infringing VirnetX's network security patents, wrapping up a damages retrial held after a nearly identical award was thrown out on appeal.
-
October 27, 2020
VirnetX Seeks $718M From Apple In EDTX Patent Retrial
VirnetX told an Eastern District of Texas jury Tuesday that Apple owes it at least $718 million for two network security patents the tech giant has infringed since 2013, but Apple contended it should only pay $113 million based on licensing agreements for similar products.
-
October 09, 2020
COVID-19 IP Catch-Up: Moderna Promises & Ed Sheeran
In this round of intellectual property updates tied to the COVID-19 pandemic, Moderna said it would hold off on enforcing certain patents and Ed Sheeran said getting to the U.S. for a copyright trial may be impossible, among many other litigation updates.