Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Think Computer Foundation et al v. Administrative Office of the United States Courts et al
Case Number:
5:14-cv-02396
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Constitutional - State Statute
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Government Agencies
Sectors & Industries:
-
December 01, 2014
Citizens United Arg In PACER Fees Suit Falls Flat
A California federal judge on Monday threw out a suit accusing the federal court system of discriminating against small businesses and indigent litigants by requiring excessive PACER fees and prohibiting corporate self-representation, ruling the U.S. Supreme Court's Citizens United decision did not let companies represent themselves.
-
August 27, 2014
US Court System Fights For Dismissal Of PACER Fees Suit
The Administrative Office of the United States Courts on Wednesday once again urged dismissal of a lawsuit claiming that it discriminates against small businesses and pro se litigants by requiring excessive PACER fees and prohibiting corporate self-representation, saying the corporate-representation principle is supported by nearly two centuries of precedent.
-
August 05, 2014
US Court System, ABA Want PACER Fees Suit Tossed
The Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and the American Bar Association on Monday urged a California federal judge to toss a lawsuit claiming that the court system discriminates against small businesses and pro se litigants by requiring excessive PACER fees and prohibiting corporate self-representation.
-
May 23, 2014
US Court System, ABA Sued For Excessive PACER Fees
Think Computer Corp. and its nonprofit arm hit the Administrative Office of the U.S. Courts and the American Bar Association with a suit in California federal court Friday, claiming the AO mandates and collects excessive PACER fees in violation of the U.S. Constitution.