Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Kelley v. BMO Harris Bank N.A., as successor to M&I Marshall and IIsley Bank,
Case Number:
0:19-cv-01756
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- Anthony Ostlund
- Debevoise & Plimpton
- Dentons
- Dorsey & Whitney
- Godfrey & Kahn
- Jones Day
- Kendall Brill & Kelly
- Mayer Brown
- Munger Tolles
- Robins Kaplan
- Stinson LLP
- Zelle LLP
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 26, 2023
BMO Harris Sees Ponzi Verdict Stick, Hit $1B With Interest
A Minnesota federal judge declined to free BMO Harris Bank NA from a $563 million jury verdict finding it liable in connection with a massive, yearslong Ponzi scheme, rejecting its claims of insufficient evidence and ordering it to pay interest that pushes the overall award north of $1 billion.
-
November 21, 2022
BMO Harris Bank Seeks Delay Of $563M Ponzi Scheme Verdict
BMO Harris Bank asked a Minnesota federal judge to suspend the enforcement of a jury verdict, without the bank having to post a bond, after it was found liable for $563 million in damages to investors for its predecessor's role in a Ponzi scheme, arguing that it is not required by law to secure the judgment while it appeals.
-
November 08, 2022
BMO Harris Bank Hit With $563M Verdict In Ponzi Scheme Trial
A Minnesota federal jury on Tuesday found BMO Harris Bank complicit in a $3.8 billion Ponzi scheme run by convicted fraudster Thomas J. Petters and awarded bilked investors $563 million in damages, a verdict the bank swiftly vowed to fight.