Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Lopez v. Apple, Inc.
Case Number:
4:19-cv-04577
See also:
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
March 19, 2024
Apple Deleted Siri Recordings, Users Say In Seeking Sanctions
Users of Apple's Siri who claim the voice-activated software records their conversations have asked a California federal judge to sanction the company for allegedly deleting millions of proposed class members' Siri records, including data they say "meticulously documented Apple's interception" of their confidential communications.
-
October 16, 2023
Apple Judge 'Puzzled' By Doc Search Bid In Siri Privacy Suit
A California federal magistrate judge Monday denied a request to compel Apple to keep looking for documents showing Siri's financial value in a proposed class action alleging the voice-activated software records user conversations, saying she's "puzzled" plaintiffs agreed to Apple's proposed custodians of record without knowing their titles and departments.
-
July 24, 2023
Apple, Atty Face Sanctions Bid Over 'Unnerving' Deposition
A group of Siri users suing Apple over privacy concerns said the company and its DLA Piper LLP attorney should be sanctioned for the lawyer's "unnerving" and "aggressive" conduct during a deposition earlier this month, although a California federal judge tossed the consumers' motion Monday because it failed to comply with local filing rules.
-
September 02, 2021
Hey, Siri? Apple Can't Hang Up On Users' Eavesdropping Suit
A California federal judge Thursday largely kept intact a proposed class action alleging that Apple Inc.'s voice-activated software Siri records conversations without user consent, finding that the amended complaint remedies the plaintiffs' previous failure to allege that their specific private conversations were intercepted.
-
February 10, 2021
Siri, Please Dismiss Eavesdropping Lawsuit Against Apple
A California federal judge dismissed on Wednesday a putative class action filed against Apple Inc. alleging its voice-activated software Siri records conversations without user consent, ruling the plaintiffs' theory of harm is "overly speculative" because there are no plausibly alleged facts that their specific communications were intercepted or disclosed.