Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- McCune Law
- Patterson Belknap
- Baker McKenzie
- Kellogg Hansen
- Freshfields
- Alioto Law Firm
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Venable LLP
- Skadden Arps
- MoloLamken
- Troutman
- Crowell & Moring
- Gibson Dunn
- Williams & Connolly
- Munger Tolles
- Bondurant Mixson
- Zelle LLP
- WalterKipling
- White & Case
- Clifford Chance
- Morrison & Foerster
- Capes Sokol
- Cozmyk Law Offices
- Cohen & Gresser
- Wilson Sonsini
- Hueston Hennigan
- Riker Danzig
- Baker Botts
- Vinson & Elkins
- Shook Hardy
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- LeGrand Law
- Ropes & Gray
- Holland & Knight
- Greenstein DeLorme
- Cravath Swaine
- Foley & Lardner
- King & Spalding
- Weil Gotshal
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- Lichten & Liss Riordan
- Larson LLP
- Aegis Law Group
- Dechert LLP
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Brownstein Hyatt
- Orrick Herrington
- Latham & Watkins
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- News Corp.
- Group M Worldwide LLC
- AT&T Inc.
- Anthropic PBC
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Digital Content Next
- NBCUniversal Media LLC
- Mozilla Corp.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Google LLC
- adMarketplace Inc.
- The Home Depot Inc.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- Apple Inc.
- DuckDuckGo Inc.
- ACT
- American Economic Liberties Project
- EE Ltd.
- ACT Corp
- Booking Holdings Inc.
- OpenAI OpCo LLC
- Yelp Inc.
- Computer & Communications Industry Association
- Chamber of Progress
- Sonos Inc.
- Oracle Corp.
- Yahoo Inc.
- ACT The App Association
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Comcast Corp.
Government Agencies
- State of Nevada
- State of Indiana
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Tennessee
- State of Michigan
- Federal Trade Commission
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 08, 2022
Google's 'Privilege' Labeling Unlikely To Yield Sanctions
A D.C. federal judge indicated Friday he's unlikely to sanction Google based on U.S. Department of Justice allegations that the search giant trained employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged, asserting during a hearing that there's no precedent for punishing pre-litigation conduct.
-
April 07, 2022
DOJ Says Google's 8,000 New Releases Show Privilege Abuse
In the week after the U.S. Department of Justice accused Google of training employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged, the search giant released more than 8,000 documents it previously wrongly withheld, the agency said in a brief supporting its sanction bid.
-
March 24, 2022
Google Says Attys CC'd Under Legit Rules, Not Fake Privilege
Google told a D.C. federal judge Thursday there was nothing nefarious about company training instructing employees to copy attorneys on certain communications and marking them as privileged, assailing a U.S. Department of Justice sanctions bid accusing the search giant of trying to "hide potential evidence" with false privilege labels.
-
March 21, 2022
DOJ Says Google Abusing Attorney-Client Privilege Claims
The U.S. Department of Justice wants Google sanctioned in the search advertising monopolization case over allegations that the company trains employees to help shield documents from discovery by making them appear privileged.
-
March 09, 2022
DOJ, Google Continue Tussling Over Discovery
The U.S. Department of Justice filed a motion for sanctions against Google Inc. ahead of a conference in D.C. federal court Wednesday over discovery disputes in the government's search advertising monopolization case.
-
February 22, 2022
Google Antitrust Judge OKs DOJ's 'Likely' Witness List
A D.C. federal judge agreed with the Justice Department and state attorneys general Monday in a dispute with Google over the language that should be used for lists of potential witnesses in a landmark antitrust suit against the technology giant and capped potential third-party witnesses at 40 per side.
-
February 18, 2022
DOJ, Google Still Can't Agree Over 'Likely' Witness Lists
State and federal antitrust enforcers and Google told a D.C. federal judge Thursday they are close to finalizing their lists of potential witnesses to call in a case accusing the technology giant of monopolizing search and search advertising, but that the parties still disagree about wording.
-
February 11, 2022
Google Calls 300 Potential DOJ, AG Witnesses A 'Fake List'
State and federal antitrust enforcers may have to winnow down their lists of potential witnesses to call in a case accusing Google of monopolizing search and search advertising after the technology giant complained to a D.C. federal judge Friday of an overwhelming initial tally from the government.
-
January 07, 2022
'Unrealistic' Bid For Google Revenue-Sharing Docs Mires DOJ
A D.C. federal judge Friday said the U.S. Department of Justice is being "unrealistic" by demanding Google reveal the "methodology" used to calculate what it's willing to pay phone companies and mobile carriers to make Google Search their default when the payments largely result from individual negotiations.
-
December 07, 2021
DOJ Case Against Google Formally Split In Two
The official order has come down splitting Google's upcoming antitrust monopoly trials in two, after the tech behemoth and the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcers bringing suit convinced a D.C. federal court that getting liability out of the way first was the best way to go.