Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al v. GOOGLE LLC
Case Number:
1:20-cv-03010
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
- MoloLamken
- Zelle LLP
- McDermott Will & Emery
- Dechert LLP
- Ropes & Gray
- Lewis & Llewellyn
- Holland & Knight
- Baker Botts
- Freshfields
- WalterKipling
- Bondurant Mixson
- Cozmyk Law Offices
- King & Spalding
- McCune Law
- Cohen & Gresser
- Simpson Thacher & Bartlett LLP
- Patterson Belknap
- Greenstein DeLorme
- Davis Polk
- Berkowitz Lichtstein
- Alioto Law Firm
- Williams & Connolly
- Weil Gotshal
- Larson LLP
- Gibson Dunn
- Foley & Lardner
- Hueston Hennigan
- Skadden Arps
- Clifford Chance
- Troutman
- Aegis Law Group
- Kellogg Hansen
- Shook Hardy
- Capes Sokol
- Orrick Herrington
- Wilson Sonsini
- Crowell & Moring
- Latham & Watkins
- White & Case
Companies
- Group M Worldwide LLC
- News Corp.
- American Antitrust Institute
- Anthropic PBC
- Apple Inc.
- Yahoo Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- American Economic Liberties Project
- The Home Depot Inc.
- Google LLC
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Microsoft Corp.
- NBCUniversal Media LLC
- Digital Content Next
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- adMarketplace Inc.
- DuckDuckGo Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Booking Holdings Inc.
- Yelp Inc.
- Comcast Corp.
- Sonos Inc.
- Verizon Communications Inc.
- Oracle Corp.
- AT&T Inc.
Government Agencies
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Nevada
- State of Tennessee
- State of Maryland
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- State of Indiana
- State of Michigan
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 27, 2024
Google Rips Rumble's 'Fishing Expedition' For DOJ Trial Docs
Google urged a California magistrate judge Thursday to reject video-sharing site Rumble's demands for depositions and trial exhibits from the U.S. Justice Department's antitrust bench trial against Google in Washington, D.C., arguing that the requests are irrelevant to Rumble's antitrust claims and an unfounded "post-hoc fishing expedition."
-
May 03, 2024
Judge Asks About Ad Quality As Google Search Trial Wraps
The D.C. federal judge overseeing the government's search monopolization case against Google peppered attorneys from both sides on Friday during the final day of trial arguments about how to address Google's contention that it raises ad prices to coincide with product improvements.
-
May 02, 2024
Google Judge Ponders Search Engine's Might At Trial Closings
The quality of Google's search engine, and what it would take to actually challenge the company's grip on default placements on Apple browsers and Android phones, were top of mind Thursday for the D.C. federal judge weighing U.S. Department of Justice monopolization allegations.
-
March 13, 2024
Google Calls DOJ's 'Fake Privilege' Docs Citation 'Misleading'
The D.C. federal judge weighing the fate of Google's search business should pay no heed to discussions, cited by the Justice Department, from company lawyers in a separate case of "fake privilege" hiding otherwise discoverable evidence, Google has said.
-
March 11, 2024
Google Search Judge Wary Of NYT Bid To Make Docs Public
The D.C. federal judge weighing the fate of Google's search business pushed back during a Monday hearing on the New York Times' bid for a large scale unsealing of key contracts at the heart of the Justice Department antitrust lawsuit, although he left any final decisions for another day.
-
February 29, 2024
Epic, Google Are At App Store Antitrust Remedies 'Impasse'
Epic Games Inc. and Google LLC told a California federal judge on Wednesday that they are at an impasse over the potential changes Google will have to make following the Fortnite game developer's jury trial win on antitrust claims related to Google Play Store and Android apps.
-
February 28, 2024
Google Attys' 'Fake Privilege' Comments Cited In Search Suit
The U.S. Justice Department and states accusing Google of monopolizing the online-search market have asked a D.C. federal judge to consider internal chats disclosed in Epic Games' antitrust lawsuit that revealed Google's lawyers discussing "fake privilege" — a practice of unnecessarily involving a lawyer to make an exchange confidential.
-
February 23, 2024
Google Says Innovation Led To Dominance In Closing Brief
Google is telling the D.C. federal judge overseeing the U.S. Department of Justice's monopoly case against the search giant that its innovation and relentlessness are the forces driving its dominance in search, not anticompetitive agreements as the Justice Department has alleged.
-
January 01, 2024
Retail Cases To Watch In 2024
A wide variety of cases are likely to keep retail industry attorneys busy in 2024, including high-profile antitrust actions against Amazon and Google, a growing number of greenwashing disputes, and skirmishes between major retailers and their increasingly unionized workforces.
-
November 30, 2023
Hey Google, What's Next?
The fate of Google's largest source of revenue remains months, and probably years, away from resolution after 10 weeks of trial on the government's antitrust allegations targeting the contracts that make Google the default search engine on the devices and browsers used by most Americans.