Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Netlist, Inc. v. SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS CO., LTD. et al
Case Number:
2:21-cv-00463
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Judge:
Firms
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 02, 2024
Samsung, Micron Notch PTAB Wins On Netlist Patents
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board decided Monday that two Netlist computer memory patents are invalid, in a win for Samsung, which was previously found to infringe the patents in a $303 million Texas verdict, and Micron, whose infringement trial was postponed to await the rulings.
-
December 19, 2023
The Top Patent Damages Awards Of 2023
While 2023 didn’t feature any of the blockbuster verdicts that had become the norm in recent years, the number of patent trials jumped as the COVID-19 bottleneck broke, and multiple juries came back with nine-figure verdicts. Here are the top damages awards from 2023.
-
December 06, 2023
Samsung Gets PTAB To Knock Out Patent From $303M Verdict
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found that all the claims in a Netlist flash memory patent were not valid, handing a win to Samsung as part of a larger intellectual property fight that has involved multiple patents.
-
August 14, 2023
Gilstrap Confirms Samsung Owes $303M After Patent Trial
A Texas federal judge has finalized a finding that Samsung owes more than $303 million to a California company that designs circuit boards that store flash memory after a jury trial earlier this year.
-
May 25, 2023
IP Forecast: Paul Hastings To Attack DQ Bid In Coke Feud
Top lawyers at Paul Hastings are set to testify before a Florida federal magistrate judge to defend the firm’s representation of a beverage cooling business bringing a $100 million trade secrets suit against Coca-Cola, a longtime client of the firm. Here's a look at that case — plus all the other major intellectual property matters on deck in the coming week.
-
April 21, 2023
Samsung Owes $303M Over Chip Patents, Texas Jury Finds
A federal jury in Marshall, Texas, on Friday found that Samsung owes more than $303 million to a California company that designs circuit boards that store flash memory — a little more than $100 million less than lawyers initially asked for when the trial began a week ago.