Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

April 28, 2023

Schuman et al v. Energizer Holding, Inc. et al

Track this case

Case Number:

3:23-cv-02093

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Beth Labson Freeman

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

View recent docket activity

Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.

Coverage

  1. September 29, 2026

    Walmart, Energizer Battery Buyers Lose Antitrust Cert. Bid

    A California federal judge denied class certification Monday in three suits alleging Energizer schemed with Walmart to artificially inflate disposable battery prices, finding the buyers' economists' regression models comparing battery prices to lighting products could not reliably show the alleged agreement raised prices.

1 other articles on this case. View all »

Parties

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Direct access to case information and documents.
  • All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
  • Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
  • No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View the parties now

Already a subscriber? Click here to login