Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
August 19, 2024
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC
Case Number:
3:24-cv-05417
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- ADR Office of Theo Cheng
- Arnold & Porter
- Cooley LLP
- Cowan DeBaets
- Duncan Firm
- Edelson PC
- Fairmark Partners LLP
- Freedman Normand
- Freshfields
- Gaw Poe
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mintz & Gold
- Morrison & Foerster
- Oppenheim & Zebrak
- Slarskey LLC
- Stris & Maher
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
March 20, 2026
Authors' Attys Cut Fee Bid To $187M In $1.5B Anthropic IP Deal
Authors who allege Anthropic pirated their work to train its Claude chatbot urged a California federal judge to grant final approval to Anthropic's $1.5 billion settlement, along with an attorney fee request revised down from $300 million to $187.5 million, arguing the deal is fair despite multiple objections.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login