Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
August 19, 2024
Bartz et al v. Anthropic PBC
Case Number:
3:24-cv-05417
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
17:501 Copyright Infringement
Judge:
Firms
- ADR Office of Theo Cheng
- Arnold & Porter
- Cooley LLP
- Cowan DeBaets
- Edelson PC
- Fairmark Partners LLP
- Freedman Normand
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Kwun Bhansali
- Latham & Watkins
- Lieff Cabraser
- Mintz & Gold
- Morrison & Foerster
- Oppenheim & Zebrak
- Stris & Maher
- Susman Godfrey
Companies
Sectors & Industries:
View recent docket activity
Reflects complaints, answers, motions, orders and trial notes entered from Jan. 1, 2011.
Additional or older documents may be available in Pacer.
Coverage
-
December 18, 2025
Nonclass Attys' $75M Fee Request Too High, Anthropic Says
Anthropic says the $75 million in fees that nonclass counsel requested as part of the artificial intelligence company's $1.5 billion copyright settlement with authors is far too high, arguing there is "scant justification" for the request.
Parties
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Direct access to case information and documents.
- All significant new filings across U.S. federal district courts, updated hourly on business days.
- Full-text searches on all patent complaints in federal courts.
- No-fee downloads of the complaints and so much more!
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login