Commercial Litigation UK

  • July 18, 2025

    Paralegal's Bias Claims Tossed Over 'Unreasonable' Conduct

    A paralegal's employment claims against a law firm and legal recruiter have been thrown out, after a judge concluded Friday that her conduct in the proceedings is so unreasonable it's impossible to have a fair hearing.

  • July 18, 2025

    Odey Fights To Delay Libel Trial Amid Sex Assault Claims

    U.K. hedge fund manager Crispin Odey argued in a London court on Friday that his £79 million ($106.3 million) libel claim against the Financial Times should be put on hold while he defends against claims by five women accusing him of sexual abuse.

  • July 18, 2025

    Engineer Sues Broker For Negligence Over PI Policy Notice

    A building services engineer has accused its broker of negligence for allegedly failing to notify one of its insurers about a row in which it was involved over a generator system that it said could leave it "liable for substantial sums."

  • July 18, 2025

    Mastercard, Visa Face New Swipe Fees Claim By UK Retailers

    Harcus Parker is preparing a new class action on behalf of retailers allegedly overcharged by Visa and Mastercard for accepting debit and credit card payments after a tribunal ruled that the transactions fees breach U.K. competition law. 

  • July 18, 2025

    UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London

    This past week in London has seen the former owner of British oil refinery Prax Group sued following the collapse of his business empire, a unit of Shard Credit Partners target a married couple believed to have inflated the value of their companies before selling them, and Aerofoil Energy reignite patent action against AFE Group over the design of its F1-inspired cooling units.

  • July 18, 2025

    Insurer Denies Changing Life Policy To Cut Illness Cover

    Countrywide Assured has said two of its clients chose a policy without advice that did not provide cover for critical illness, arguing that it doesn't owe one of them £250,000 ($336,000) over claims that he was left short after a serious heart attack.

  • July 17, 2025

    EU Sends Hungary To Court Of Justice Over ECT Stance

    The European Commission said it will refer Hungary to the European Union's Court of Justice to address a potential violation of EU law, claiming it has contradicted the union's position on intra-EU arbitrations under the Energy Charter Treaty and refused to abide by the court's case law.

  • July 17, 2025

    US Challenge To Belgian Minimum Tax Rules Heads To ECJ

    A Belgian court said Thursday it has asked the European Union's highest court to weigh in on a U.S. industry group's challenge to the country's global minimum tax rules.

  • July 17, 2025

    Dechert Settles Jordanian Lawyers' UAE Torture Claims

    Dechert and Neil Gerrard, its former head of white collar crime, have settled claims of torture and hacking in a web of litigation spawned from the firm's work for a UAE sovereign wealth fund, a spokesperson for the outfit confirmed Thursday.

  • July 17, 2025

    UK Landlords Face Group Claim Over 'Hidden' Insurance Fees

    A campaign group for apartment owners said Thursday that it has sent letters to some of the U.K.'s largest landowners warning them of possible litigation over allegedly secret commissions from insurance premiums.

  • July 17, 2025

    Tesco Must Wait For Appeal In Equal Pay Case

    A London appeals court delayed on Thursday an appeal by Tesco in lengthy equal pay litigation between the retail giant and around 55,000 workers to consider it at a later date because of an upcoming ruling by a lower appellate tribunal.

  • July 17, 2025

    Retailer Says Rival Can't Sue Over Amazon Listing Dispute

    A homewares retailer has argued that a baby-clothes maker can't sue it for reputational damage over its infringement report that led Amazon to remove a listing for a children's bike, as it had agreed to withdraw the design registration that supported the claim. 

  • July 18, 2025

    CORRECTED: South Korea Can Challenge $48.5M Award In Samsung Merger Case

    Correction: An earlier version of the story misstated the nature of the panel's decision. That has now been corrected.

  • July 16, 2025

    AstraZeneca Loses Bid To Revive Patent For Diabetes Drug

    The Court of Appeal refused Wednesday to revive AstraZeneca's intellectual property protections for its billion-dollar diabetes drug, opening the way for generic competition to hit the market.

  • July 16, 2025

    TfL Threatened With Litigation Over Licensing Delays

    A labor union said Wednesday that it is suing Transport for London over delays in processing licenses for private hire vehicles, as the issues were forcing members of ride-hailing apps such as Uber and Bolt to rack up huge debts and go months without working.

  • July 16, 2025

    Le Pen Heirs Lose Challenge To €300K Expenses Recovery

    A European Union court on Wednesday rejected an appeal by the daughters of dead French politician Jean-Marie Le Pen, including Marine Le Pen, against an order to pay back €303,000 ($353,000) of misused expenses.

  • July 16, 2025

    ENRC Bids To Overturn $128M Cut From SFO Claim

    ENRC fought at a London appellate court on Wednesday to overturn a decision blocking it from adding approximately $128 million in damages the mining company alleges it suffered from a Serious Fraud Office investigation, arguing that it had applied the incorrect legal principles.

  • July 16, 2025

    Dubai Bank Wins Document Fraud Claim in £80M Debt Fight

    A judgment that blocked a Dubai bank from recovering £80 million ($107 million) from three members of an Emirati business family was fraudulently obtained with bogus documents, a London court has ruled.

  • July 16, 2025

    BT Landline Clients Pushing To Revive £1.3B Class Action

    BT landline customers who were part of a £1.3 billion ($1.7 billion) collective action against the telecoms giant asked the Court of Appeal on Wednesday for permission to challenge findings that prices charged by the company were not unfair.

  • July 16, 2025

    Freight Co. Loses Interim Bid To Lift HMRC Export Controls

    A warehouse operator and drinks merchant have lost a bid for interim relief against U.K. tax authority export controls imposed over tax fraud concerns, with a London court ruling they had an "uphill task" to prove the measures were unreasonable.

  • July 16, 2025

    Ex-Pogust Goodhead Staffer Can't Revive Bias Case

    A tribunal has rejected a bid by a Pogust Goodhead employee to revive claims that the firm discriminated against her and fired her over her multiple sclerosis, ruling that she couldn't get a "second bite of the cherry" because she was disappointed over previous defeat.  

  • July 16, 2025

    Car Sales Reps Win £356K Payout After 'Somali Pirate' Slur

    A tribunal has ordered a car dealership to pay two former sales representatives a total of £356,000 ($477,000) after they experienced race discrimination and harassment, with one manager frequently using the slur "Somali pirate."

  • July 15, 2025

    Trainline Accuses Gov't Of Unlawfully Awarding £32M Contract

    Trainline.com Ltd. has sued the government for allegedly deciding to award a competitor an overpriced £32 million ($42.9 million) contract relating to an online rail ticketing platform in breach of "the most basic and fundamental standards of transparency" for procurement processes.

  • July 15, 2025

    Law Firm Beats Ex-Staffer's Bid To Revive Client Contact Case

    A former employee of a Yorkshire law firm has failed to persuade an employment tribunal to revisit its ruling rejecting her claims that the firm failed to safeguard her against abusive emails sent by her ex-partner to her work email.

  • July 15, 2025

    'Orange King' And Son Say Cartel Claims Are Stale

    The estate and son of Brazil's late "Orange King" argued in a London trial Tuesday that claims by more than 1,400 Brazilian orange farmers over a price-fixing cartel should be halted because they were brought out of time.

Expert Analysis

  • UK Amazon Ruling Spotlights TM Rights In International Sales

    Author Photo

    Highlighting the conflict between the territorial nature of trademark rights and the borderless nature of the internet, the U.K. Supreme Court's recent decision — that Amazon's U.S. website could infringe EU and U.K. rights by targeting local buyers — offers guidance on navigating trademark rights in relation to online sales, say Emmy Hunt, Mark Kramer and Jordan Mitchell at Potter Clarkson.

  • UK Courts Continue To Struggle With Crypto-Asset Cases

    Author Photo

    Although the common law has proved capable of applying established principles to crypto-assets, recent cases highlight persistent challenges in identifying defendants, locating assets and determining jurisdiction, suggesting that any meaningful development will likely come from legislative or regulatory change, say Emily Saunderson and Sam Mitchell at Quadrant Chambers.

  • Why Computer Evidence Is Not Always Reliable In Court

    Author Photo

    Recent challenges to the admissibility of encrypted communication from the messaging tool EncroChat highlight the flawed presumption in the U.K. common law framework that computer evidence is always accurate, and why a nuanced assessment of such evidence is needed, say Sam De Silva and Josie Welland at CMS Legal.

  • Lessons On Using 3rd-Party Disclosure Orders In Fraud Cases

    Author Photo

    The expansion of the gateway for service out of jurisdiction regarding third-party information orders has proven to be an effective tool against fraud since it was introduced in 2022, and recent case law offers practical tips on what applicants should be aware of when submitting such orders, says Rosie Wild at Cooke Young.

  • Bias Ruling Offers Guidance On Disqualifying Arbitrators

    Author Photo

    An English court's recent decision in H1 v. W, removing an arbitrator due to bias concerns, reaffirms practical considerations when assessing an arbitrator's impartiality, and highlights how ill-chosen language by an arbitrator can clear the high bar for disqualification, say Andrew Connelly and Ian Meredith at K&L Gates.

  • Employer Lessons From Ruling On Prof's Anti-Zionist Views

    Author Photo

    In Miller v. University of Bristol, an employment tribunal recently ruled that a professor's anti-Zionist beliefs were protected by the Equality Act 2010, highlighting for employers why it’s important to carefully consider disciplinary actions related to an employee's political expressions, says Hina Belitz at Excello Law.

  • Design Rights Can Build IP Protection, EU Lego Ruling Shows

    Author Photo

    The EU General Court's recent ruling in Delta Sport v. EU Intellectual Property Office — that Lego's registered community design for a building block was valid — helps clarify when technically dictated designs can enjoy IP protection, and demonstrates how companies can strategically use design rights to protect and enhance their market position, says Christoph Moeller at Mewburn Ellis.

  • ECJ Ruling Clarifies Lawyer Independence Questions

    Author Photo

    The European Court of Justice's recent ruling in Bonnanwalt v. EU Intellectual Property Office, finding that a law firm had maintained independence despite being owned by its client, serves as a pivotal reference point to understanding the contours of legal representation before EU courts, say James Tumbridge and Benedict Sharrock-Harris at Venner Shipley.

  • Unpacking The Law Commission's Digital Assets Consultation

    Author Photo

    The Law Commission recently published a consultation on recognizing a third personal property category to accommodate the development of digital assets, highlighting difficulties with current models of property rights and the potential consequences of considering digital assets as personal property, say Andrew Tsang and Tom Bacon at BCLP.

  • 1st Appellate Ruling On Digital Terms Sets Tone For Disputes

    Author Photo

    The Court of Appeal's recent ruling in Parker-Grennan v. Camelot, the first appellate decision to consider how online terms and conditions are publicized, provides, in its tone and verdict on incorporation, an invaluable guide for how to approach similar disputes in the digital space, says Eddy Eccles at Covington.

  • Insurance Policy Takeaways From UK Lockdown Loss Ruling

    Author Photo

    An English court's recent decision in Unipolsai v. Covea, determining that insurers' losses from COVID-19 lockdowns were covered by reinsurance, highlights key issues on insurance policy wordings, including how to define a "catastrophe" in the context of the pandemic, says Daniel Healy at Brown Rudnick.

  • How Employers Should Respond To Flexible Work Requests

    Author Photo

    U.K. employees will soon have the right to request flexible working arrangements from the first day of employment, including for religious observances, and refusing them without objective justification could expose employers to indirect discrimination claims and hurt companies’ diversity and inclusion efforts, says Jim Moore at Hamilton Nash.

  • What COVID Payout Ruling Means For Lockdown Loss Claims

    Author Photo

    While the High Court's recent COVID-19 payout decision in Gatwick v. Liberty Mutual, holding that pandemic-related regulations trigger prevention of access clauses, will likely lead to insurers accepting more business interruption claims, there are still evidentiary challenges and issues regarding policy limits and furlough, say Josianne El Antoury and Greg Lascelles at Covington.

  • Spartan Arbitration Tactics Against Well-Funded Opponents

    Author Photo

    Like the ancient Spartans who held off a numerically superior Persian army at the Battle of Thermopylae, trial attorneys and clients faced with arbitration against an opponent with a bigger war chest can take a strategic approach to create a pass to victory, say Kostas Katsiris and Benjamin Argyle at Venable.

  • Opinion

    PACCAR Should Be 1st Step To Regulating Litigation Funders

    Author Photo

    Rather than reversing the U.K. Supreme Court's well-reasoned judgment in PACCAR v. Competition Appeal Tribunal, imposing a regulatory regime on litigation funders in parity with that of lawyers, legislators should build upon it to create a more transparent, competitive and fairer funding industry, says Rosa Curling at Foxglove.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Commercial Litigation UK archive.