Case Activity (370)

1. Motion | Filed: August 03, 2026 | Entered: August 03, 2026 Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al

   Insurance | New York Southern

   Extension of Time to File Document

   LETTER MOTION for Extension of Time to File Documents Referenced in Unsealing Order (ECF 732) addressed to Judge Lorna G. Schofield from Daniel L. Russell Jr. dated July 31, 2026. Document filed by Northrop Grumman Corporation, Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation..(Russell, Daniel)

2. Order | Filed: July 29, 2026 Travelers Indemnity Company et al v. Northrop Grumman Corporation et al

   Insurance | New York Southern

   Order

   OPINION & ORDER re: 723 MOTION to Intervene and Unseal. filed by Newsday LLC. For the foregoing reasons, Newsday's motion to intervene is GRANTED. The motion to unseal is DENIED as moot as to the following documents: Dkt. N os. 57 and 271 because these documents are not sealed; The sealed exhibits to Dkt. No. 271 because they are filed under Dkt. No. 278, which is separately unsealed; Dkt. Nos. 450, 464, 498, 499 and 538 because Newsday moves to unseal only to the ex tent that these documents were filed in connection with a summary judgment motion; Dkt. No. 494 but only as to the final two documents in that filing (a memorandum of law and a declaration) which relate to a motion to exclude expert testimony rath er than to a motion for summary judgment and Dkt. Nos. 61-5 to 61-13 because they are insurance policies which Newsday has withdrawn from its motion, i.e., the Withdrawn Documents. The motion to unseal is GRANTED as to all other Documents (as that t erm is defined above), except as to any redactions necessary to comply with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 5.2 and/or to protect individuals identities or other personal identifying information or medical information. By August 12, 2026, NG and Trav elers shall file on the docket the Documents thatare newly unsealed pursuant to this Opinion & Order (with redactions as ordered above) and file unredacted versions under seal on the docket. Each such Document shall be labeled on its face to include the original document number under which it was filed, as well as any other information necessary to identify the document in the context of its original filing (e.g., if not otherwise evident: the date of the original filing, the party that filed th e document, the motion to which the document relates and whether the document was in support of or in opposition to the motion). The parties may contact chambers for assistance to the extent that they do not have copies of Documents placed in the va ult. The Clerk of Court is respectfully directed (1) not to lift the electronic seal from any unsealed Documents filed on CM ECF, as the parties will effect unsealing by filing new copies and (2) to close the motion at Dkt. No. 723. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 7/29/2026) (ks)

3. 368 additional result(s)