Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Reliance Communications Ltd.
-
Order | Filed: September 12, 2023 | Entered: September 12, 2023 Altamura v. Reliance Communications, LLC et al
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Eastern
Judgment - Clerk
CLERK'S JUDGMENT: ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiff Frank Altamura take nothing of Defendants Reliance Communications, LLC, Airtyme Communications, LLC, Delhi Heights, LLC, Wireless Works NY, Inc., Myra Properties, LLC, Parveen Narula, and Ashima Narula; that Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment as to the FLSA claims is denied; that Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment as to the FLSA claims is granted; that the FLSA claims are dismissed with prejudice; that Plaintiff's state law claims are dismissed without prejudice for lack of supplemental jurisdiction; that the remaining aspects of the parties' cross-motions are denied; and that this case is closed. Ordered by Clerk of Court on 9/12/2023. (JT)
-
Motion | Filed: June 15, 2022 | Entered: September 11, 2023 Altamura v. Reliance Communications, LLC et al
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Eastern
Summary Judgment
Cross MOTION for Summary Judgment Cross-motion at ECF No. 104-28 by Airtyme Communications, LLC, Delhi Heights, LLC, Myra Properties, LLC, Ashima Narula, Parveen Narula, Reliance Communications, LLC, Wireless Works NY Inc.. (CV)
-
Order | Filed: September 11, 2023 Altamura v. Reliance Communications, LLC et al
Labor: Fair Standards | New York Eastern
Order
MEMORANDUM & ORDER - For the stated reasons, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the R&R is ADOPTED IN PART as follows: (1) Plaintiff's motion for summary judgment is DENIED as to the FLSA claims; (2) Defendants' cross-motion for summary judgment is GRANTED as to the FLSA claims and those claims are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; and (3) Plaintiff's state law claims are DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of supplemental jurisdiction. The Court declines to consider the remaining portions of th e R&R to which the parties objected, as they are now MOOT. Consequently, the remaining aspects of the parties' cross-motions are DENIED. The Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and to mark this case closed. So Ordered by Judge Joanna Seybert on 9/11/2023. (CV)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login