Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in The Kraft Heinz Co x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
791(Labor: E.R.I.S.A.) | Illinois Northern
Transcript Of Proceedings
TRANSCRIPT OF PROCEEDINGS held on 09/01/2026 before the Honorable Thomas M. Durkin. Telephonic Motion Hearing. Order Number: 57914. Court Reporter Contact Information: EECarrionOfficialTranscript@gmail.com.
IMPORTANT: The transcript may be viewed at the court's public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through the Court Reporter/Transcriber or PACER. For further information on the redaction process, see the Court's web site at www.ilnd.uscourts.gov under Quick Links select Policy Regarding the Availability of Transcripts of Court Proceedings.
Environmental Matters | New York Eastern
Pre Motion Conference
Minute Order. A pre-motion conference was held on September 3, 2026 before Judge Margo K. Brodie to discuss the anticipated motions to dismiss by Defendants 286 Power Authority of New York, 297 Hess Corp., Texaco, Inc., and Union Oil Company of California, 300 Metropolitan Transportation Authority and the New York City Transit Authority, 301 Astoria Generating Company, L.P., and 302 Beazer East, Inc. Bradley Scott Rochlen, Ann Helen MacDonald, and Sonul Rao appeared on behalf of Plaintiff; Mary Rose Alexander and Nathaniel Lawrence Glynn appeared on behalf of Defendants Astoria Generating Company, L.P. and Beazer East, Inc.; Jonathan Racuhway appeared on behalf of Defendants Hess Corp., Texaco, Inc., and Union Oil Company of California; Charles Stanley Warren appeared on behalf of Defendants Power Authority of the State of New York; and Adam Kirschbaum and David G. Mandelbaum appeared on behalf of Defendants New York City Transit Authority and Metropolitan Transportation Authority. The Court heard oral argument from the parties and, for the reasons stated on the record, the Court finds each pre-motion conference request without merit. In view of this Order, Defendants' respective anticipated motions to dismiss are denied as moot. (Court Reporter Nicole Sesta.) (FSC)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.