Law360 - The Newswire for Business Lawyers

Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Law360 Law360
  Sign In

Law360

|

The Practice of Law

Access to Justice Aerospace & Defense Appellate Asset Management Banking Bankruptcy Benefits California Cannabis Capital Markets Class Action Colorado Commercial Contracts Competition Compliance Connecticut Construction Consumer Protection Corporate Criminal Practice Cybersecurity & Privacy Delaware Employment
Energy Environmental Fintech Florida Food & Beverage Georgia Government Contracts Health Hospitality Illinois Immigration Insurance Intellectual Property International Arbitration International Trade Legal Ethics Legal Industry Life Sciences Massachusetts Media & Entertainment Mergers & Acquisitions Michigan Native American
New Jersey New York North Carolina Ohio Pennsylvania Personal Injury & Medical Malpractice Private Equity Product Liability Project Finance Public Policy Real Estate Retail & E-Commerce Securities Sports & Betting Tax Technology Telecommunications Texas Transportation Trials Washington White Collar

Law360 Pulse

|

Business of Law

California Pulse Connecticut Pulse Courts DC Pulse Daily Litigation Delaware Pulse
Florida Pulse Georgia Pulse In-House Insights Legal Tech & AI Mid-Law
Modern Lawyer New Jersey Pulse New York Pulse Pennsylvania Pulse Small Law Texas Pulse

Law360 Authority

|

Deep News & Analysis

Tax Authority

Federal International State & Local

Employment Authority

Discrimination Labor Other Wage & Hour

Insurance Authority

General Liability Other Property Specialty Lines

Real Estate Authority

Commercial Other Residential

Bankruptcy Authority

Large Cap Mid Cap

Healthcare Authority

Deals & Corporate Governance Digital Health & Technology Other Policy & Compliance

Law360 Global Products

Law360 UK

Commercial Litigation UK Corporate Crime & Compliance UK Employment UK
Financial Services UK Insurance UK Intellectual Property UK
Pulse UK Transactions UK

Law360 Australia

Commercial Disputes AU Financial Services AU

Close
    • Law360 US
    • Law360
    • Law360 Pulse
    • Law360 Employment Authority
    • Law360 Tax Authority
    • Law360 Insurance Authority
    • Law360 Real Estate Authority
    • Law360 Bankruptcy Authority
    • Law360 Healthcare Authority
    • Sections
    • Adv. Search & Platform Tools
    • Commercial Litigation UK
    • Corporate Crime & Compliance UK
    • Employment UK
    • Financial Services UK
    • Insurance UK
    • Intellectual Property UK
    • Pulse UK
    • Transactions UK
    • Site Menu
    • Join the Law360 team
    • Search legal jobs
    • Learn more about Law360
    • Read testimonials
    • Contact Law360
    • Sign up for our newsletters
    • Law360 Company
    • About Law360 Authority
    • Resource Library
Commercial Litigation Corporate Crime & Compliance Employment Financial Services Insurance Pulse Law360 US || See all sections

Searching dockets in Valero Energy Corp

 

Please assign a name to this alert

All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes

Case Activity (21047)

  1. Order | Filed: September 18, 2026 In re Claims Against the Valero-Petrocedeno Account

    | New York Southern

    Order

    ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF ANTONIO CABALLERO'S MOTION FOR FINAL TRIA TURNOVER ORDER AND JUDGMENT: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Turnover Motion is GRANTED. The Court enters this Final TRIA Turnover Order and Judgment in favor of Cabal lero directing the turnover of the funds in the Blocked Account. Based on the record regarding the Blocked Account, the Court finds and rules as follows: 1) This Court has subject matter jurisdiction to conduct post-judgment execution proceedings on Caballero's final judgment, under the Anti-Terrorism Act ("ATA"), 18 U.S.C. § 2333(a)-(e), rendered by the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida in Antonio Caballero v. FARC, et al., No. 1:18-cv-25337-KMM (the "Caballero Judgment"). The Caballero Judgment has been registered in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1963. ECF No. 1. 2) JPMorgan established the Blocked Account, in the original amount of $1,000,000, on or about April 11, 2017. ECF No. 221 at paragraph 2. The Blocked Account is blocked under 31 C.F.R Part 598, the Foreign Narcotics Kingpin Sanctions Regulations administered by the Office of Foreign Assets Control (&quot ;OFAC") of the U.S. Treasury Department. Id. JPMorgan, as garnishee, holds the Blocked Account, in New York, in accordance with 31 C.F.R. Part 598. Id. as further set forth. 12) The Court concludes that Caballero is the only party with a wr it for the Blocked Account. 13) There are no issues left to resolve in this interpleader (ECF No. 221), which proceeding shall be closed by entry of this Final TRIA Turnover Order and Judgment. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that: 1. Caballero is entitled under TRIA § 201(a) to recover the funds in the Blocked Account, including all interest accrued thereon. 2. Subject to Section 4.d below, JPMorgan shall transfer to Caballero the funds in the Blocked Account, including all accrued interest thro ugh the date this Final TRIA Turnover Order and Judgment becomes final and non-appealable as described in Section 4.d below, via wire transfer to Zumpano Patricios, P.A., counsel of record for Caballero. The transfer shall be made within 14 days aft er this Final TRIA Turnover Order and Judgment has become final and non-appealable under Section 4.d below, as further set forth. 5. This Order constitutes a final judgment within the meaning of Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b), and there is no just reason for delay in the entry of it as a final judgment, subject to Section 4.d. 6. This Court shall retain jurisdiction over this matter to enforce any violation of this Final TRIA Turnover Order and Judgment. (Signed by Judge Lorna G. Schofield on 9/17/2026) (mml)

  2. Motion | Filed: September 18, 2026 | Entered: September 18, 2026 Alban Osio et al v. Maduro Moros et al

    Racketeer/Corrupt Organization | Florida Southern

    Extension of Time

    Unopposed MOTION for Extension of Time to Answer Writ of Garnishment by Citibank N.A.. Responses due by 10/2/2026. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit [Proposed] Order Granting Citibank, N.A.'s Unopposed Motion for an Extension of Time to Answer Writ of Garnishment)(Honan, Jessica)

  3. 21045 additional result(s)

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.


  • Archive of over 450,000 articles
  • Database of over 2.1 million cases
  • Full-text search of patent complaints
  • Full-text search of PTAB cases and documents
  • Database of TTAB cases and documents, including full-text search of documents
  • Customized email alerts and so much more!

TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS

View full search results

Already a subscriber? Click here to login

Already have access? Click here to login

Get instant access to the one-stop news source for business lawyers

Register Now!

Sign up now for free access to this content

PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.

Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.

You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.

We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.

Register

Already have access?

  1. Forgot your password?
  2. Sign In
RELX Group Lexis Nexis

© 2026, Portfolio Media, Inc. | About | Contact Us | Editorial Contacts | Terms | Privacy Policy | Trust Center | Cookie Settings | Processing Notice | Ad Choices | Resource Library | Law360 Company