Expert Analysis

• Perspectives

  People In Prison Should Have Access To Digital Technology

  

  There are a number of reasons why people who are incarcerated should have access to digital communication technology — from facilitating reentry to saving lives in a future pandemic — but they need the means and the necessary legal protections to do so, say NYU Law student Suchy Kahlon and First Amendment attorney Dan Novack.

• Micromobility Can Lead To Macro Liability For Cities, Cos.

  

  E-bike and scooter manufacturers and rental operators, as well as the cities that host such services, must be aware of the major litigation risk associated with the growing number of serious accidents and injuries involving such micromobility devices — and should track emerging regulations in this area, says Arturo Aviles at Segal McCambridge.

• Opinion

  Supreme Court Must End Acquitted Conduct Sentencing

  

  While all three branches of government have shown reluctance to address the issue of acquitted conduct sentencing, including the U.S. Supreme Court in its recent denial of certiorari in a case addressing the topic, the court must — as only it can — put an end to this unconstitutional practice, say Alan Ellis at the Law Offices of Alan Ellis and Mark Allenbaugh at Sentencing Stats.

• Concerns Emerging On TM Cases Against Undisclosed Parties

  

  There has been a dramatic increase in the number of cases filed by brands against hundreds of counterfeiters as undisclosed defendants, and given these suits' debatable success in curbing counterfeiting, courts and Congress could view them as a drain on judicial resources, say Bea Swedlow and David Roulo at Honigman.

• The Crucial Privilege Exception At Play In Trump Indictment

  

  Following Donald Trump’s recent indictment for retaining classified documents, Hilary Gerzhoy at HWG explains how his attorney’s notes of their conversations became admissible in the case, what it means for the attorney's representation of Trump, and what obligations lawyers have in similar circumstances.

• Minn. 'Foreign Influence' Law May Bar US Cos. From Politics

  

  Though Minnesota's new campaign finance law aims to curb foreign spending in state and local elections, its overly strict definition of what constitutes "foreign influence" will drastically limit how even American-controlled businesses can participate in politics, say attorneys at Akin.

• Peeling Back The Layers Of Rep. George Santos' Indictment

  

  Federal prosecutors' recent 13-count criminal indictment of Rep. George Santos reflects a focused, even simplified approach, showing the kind of careful scrutiny that charges against sitting members of Congress always merit, and leaving open questions about potential charges other enforcers could bring, say Rob Walker and Caleb Burns at Wiley.

• Assessing Overlapping Boards After DOJ Crackdown

  

  The U.S. Department of Justice’s recent targeting of interlocking directorates raises questions about the scope of applicable antitrust law, including when companies will be considered competitors, whether the statute reaches potential competitors, and how companies can avoid price-fixing or market allocation charges, say attorneys at Cooley.

• Seeking Compassionate Release Under New Health Guidelines

  

  Though the U.S. Sentencing Commission recently changed its guidelines to allow prisoners who claim they are receiving inadequate medical care to apply for compassionate release, defense counsel will need to come armed with the correct case law and supporting medical documentation to successfully file for sentence reductions, say Marissa Kingman and Krista Hartrum at Fox Rothschild.

• Lawyer Discernment Is Critical In The World Of AI

  

  In light of growing practical concerns about risks and challenges posed by artificial intelligence, lawyers' experience with the skill of discernment will position them to help address new ethical and moral dilemmas and ensure that AI is developed and deployed in a way that benefits society as a whole, says Jennifer Gibbs at Zelle.

• Prepare For Stricter Capital Rules: The Basel Endgame Is Nigh

  

  With federal financial regulators made edgy by recent bank failures and likely to propose a strict U.S. version of the Basel III "endgame" capital requirements within the year, banks should expect complying with market risk management standards to become more daunting, say attorneys at Jones Day.

• 3 Reasons Why Congress Should Stay Out Of NY Trump Probe

  

  Congress members should reconsider their investigation of the Manhattan district attorney’s indictment of former President Donald Trump for several key reasons — and if they persist, future congressional leadership should adopt a rule prohibiting this kind of local interference, say Kenyen Brown and Kevin Carroll at Hughes Hubbard.

• Considering The Legal Hurdles Of Seizing State Assets

  

  Though confiscating Russian state assets and using them for the reconstruction of Ukraine is a popular idea, a recent New York federal court case over the seizure of Afghan central bank assets illustrates the risks of violating international norms regarding sovereign immunity, especially if there is a lack of due process, says Angelika Hellweger at Rahman Ravelli.

• Ore. Regulator Liquor Scandal Should Alarm Cannabis Cos.

  

  The agency that regulates Oregon's liquor and cannabis industries is embroiled in a public corruption scandal over liquor diversion practices, and state cannabis companies are feeling the fallout, from application processing delays to a growing risk of prosecution, says Kevin Jacoby at Green Light Law Group.

• Is ESG Conduct Exempt From Antitrust Scrutiny?

  

  The applicability of the Noerr-Pennington doctrine's noncommercial boycott exemption to environmental, social and governance conduct remains an open question, but U.S. Supreme Court precedent dating back four decades shows that courts could recognize an affirmative defense for boycotts motivated by ESG objectives, say Joel Mitnick and Daniel Lumer at Cadwalader.