Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Elliott Kwok
-
Order | Filed: May 13, 2024 | Entered: May 13, 2024 In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation
Contract: Other | New York Southern
Memo Endorsement ~Util - Set Deadlines/Hearings
MEMO ENDORSEMENT on re: 651 Letter, filed by Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited, Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda America Holdings, Inc. ENDORSEMENT: The parties' request for oral argument is granted. If the EPPs, or any other party, seek live witness testimony, they shall file a motion for an evidentiary hearing no later than May 20, 2024 setting forth the witnesses they wish to call and the subject matter of the anticipated testimony. Opposition to any such motion shall be filed no later than May 28, 2024 and any reply shall be filed no later than May 31, 2024. No later than May 20, 2024, the parties also shall file a joint letter setting forth at least three proposed dates in July 2024 for the oral argument and any accompanying evidentiary hearing. SO ORDERED. ( Motions due by 5/20/2024., Responses due by 5/28/2024, Replies due by 5/31/2024.) (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 5/13/2024) (rro)
-
Motion | Filed: May 13, 2024 | Entered: May 13, 2024 In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation
Contract: Other | New York Southern
Leave to File Document
MOTION for Leave to File a Sur-Reply in Further Opposition to 586 MOTION to Certify Class of End-Payor Plaintiffs. Document filed by Takeda America Holdings, Inc., Takeda Development Center Americas, Inc., Takeda Pharamceuticals, U.S.A., Inc., Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Takeda's Sur-Reply in Opposition to End-Payor Plaintiffs' Motion for Class Certification, # 2 Proposed Order Proposed Order).(Reed, Steven)
-
Order | Filed: May 10, 2024 | Entered: May 10, 2024 In re ACTOS Antitrust Litigation
Contract: Other | New York Southern
Order on Motion for Leave to File Document
ORDER denying 650 Letter Motion for Leave to File Document. Application DENIED. Having reviewed the parties' submissions, the Court, in its discretion, finds that the current deadlines for the Daubert opposition and replies should remain in place, as originally agreed. SO ORDERED. (Signed by Magistrate Judge Stewart D. Aaron on 5/10/2024) (kl)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login