Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Keller Anderle x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Other Statutory Actions | California Central
Response in Opposition to Motion
OPPOSITION to EX PARTE APPLICATION for Order for to Hold in Abeyance Defendants' Motion for Post-Judgment Discovery 425 filed by Defendants Cashcall Inc, J Paul Reddam. (Cahn, Reuben)
Sanctions on Discovery Matters
(IN CHAMBERS) ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR OTHER RELIEF (DKT. NO. 235 ) by Magistrate Judge Alka Sagar: The Court DENIES WITHOUT PREJUDICE Plaintiff's motion to compel Defendants 30(b)(6) deponent to appear at a future deposition, (Dkt. No. 235 ) as untimely because it was not filed sufficiently in advance of the fact discovery cut-off date. (See order for complete details). (afe)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.