Case Activity (6102)

1. Response | Filed: July 31, 2026 | Entered: July 31, 2026 Deshazo v. Federal Express Corporation, et al

   Motor Vehicle | Kentucky Eastern

   Response to Motion

   RESPONSE to Motion re 55 FIRST MOTION for Summary Judgment by Federal Express Corporation, Jayhill Trucking, Inc. filed by Michael Deshazo. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Ex. 1- DEF FedEx's Responses to Interrogatories, # 2 Exhibit Ex. 2- Deposition of Jarius Hill, # 3 Exhibit Ex. 3- Deposition of Gretchen Houston, # 4 Exhibit Ex. 4- Deposition of Matt Arbour, # 5 Exhibit Ex. 5- Deposition of Jesse Kirk, # 6 Exhibit Ex. 6- Deposition of Ellie Francis, # 7 Exhibit Ex. 7- Deposition of Michael DeShazo, # 8 Exhibit Ex. 8- Deposition of David Cades, # 9 Exhibit Ex. 9- Dr. Ellie Francis Report)(Mendiondo, Adrian)

2. Order | Filed: July 30, 2026 | Entered: July 30, 2026 Homeland Insurance Company of New York v. San Francisco Department of Public Health et al

   Insurance | California Northern

   Order

   ORDER

   Defendant Yoel Centeno (guardian ad litem for David Alfredo Centeno Beltran), represented by Jeremy Winter, is not participating in the litigation.

   He did not appear at the 4/23/2026 status conference and did not participate in the filing of the case management statement. The court issued an order to show cause why he should not face sanctions (including monetary or terminating sanctions) for failing to participate. ECF No. 75. While Mr. Winter indicated in an email that he would be amenable to stipulating to his client's dismissal (ECF No. 78), according to the CCSF and UHCF, Mr. Winter has not followed up on a potential stipulation and has ignored all inquiries and correspondence regarding case management statements. ECF No. 87. Mr. Winter and his client did not appear at the case management conference held on 7/30/2026 or participate in submitting a joint statement.

   Mr. Winter must file a response explaining his client's lack of participation by 8/6/2026 and appear at the 8/13/2026 hearing at 11:00 a.m. A failure to do so risks the court's imposition of sanctions, including monetary or terminating sanctions.

   The parties also flagged in their CMC statement the utility of a motion to determine whether Medicaid's priority status entitles DHCS to any of the funds in this matter. The CCSF describes this as a discrete legal question. DHCS contends that it needs to perfect its medical lien. The last hearing date for dispositive motions is December 10. ECF No. 87. This would be an early summary-judgment motion and would not preclude further dispositive motions. If the legal issue is in fact discrete, then the parties ought to be able to advance the litigation by the motion. They must include a firm schedule in their updated CMC statement due on 8/6/2026.

   Signed by Judge Laurel Beeler on 7/30/2026.

   (This is a text-only entry generated by the court. There is no document associated with this entry.)

   (lblc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/30/2026)

3. 6100 additional result(s)