Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Mccreary Veselka x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Other | Texas Western
Order ~Util - Terminate Civil Case
ORDER OF REMAND --The Court has considered the issues presented in this case and rendered its decision. For the reasons stated in the Memorandum Opinion and Order granting remand issued contemporaneously with this order, the Court REMANDS this case to the 22nd Judicial District Court, Comal County, Texas, Cause No. T-11246A. Because Defendants purport to remove five other cases (Cause No. T-11465A in the 22nd Judicial District Court, Comal County; Cause Nos. C20250636E, C2026-0193E, and C2026-0729E in the 466th Judicial District Court, Comal County; and Case No. 90316598 in the Harris County Court), the Court further directs the Clerk of Court to remand this case to those courts for those cause numbers to the extent necessary. The Clerk of Court shall effect all necessary remands in accordance with the usual procedure of the Court consistent with 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c). The Court directs the Clerk of Court to close this case.. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
Memorandum Opinion and Order
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER -GRANTING 9 Motion to Remand to State Court, filed by The County of Comal, Texas. et al. It also finds that the circumstances warrant an award of just costs and actual expenses, including attorney fees, and thus permits any plaintiff who has incurred actual expenses, including attorney fees, as a result of the removal by Defendants to file an affidavit of fees and expenses with appropriate documentation on or before September 25, 2026. On or before October 1, 2026, Defendants may file one and only one response to any such affidavit. The Court further finds that the circumstances warrant imposition of additional sanctions as imposed herein. Because the Court has granted the motion to remand based upon a lack of jurisdiction, the Court MOOTS all other motions (ECF Nos. 2, 3, 4, 5, 19, 40, 47, 48, 49, and 53). To the extent there may be unaddressed requests or motions in the litany of other filings, the Court also finds them moot.. Signed by Judge Jason K. Pulliam. (mgr)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.