Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Meyer Suozzi x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Contract: Other | New York Southern
Answer to Complaint Counterclaim
ANSWER to 1 Complaint,,,,., COUNTERCLAIM against Periscope Cybermaxx Buyer, Inc.. Document filed by Benedetto Filingeri. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Sellers' Representative's Initial CBIZ Presentation, # 2 Exhibit B - Sellers' Representative's Reply CBIZ Presentation, # 3 Exhibit C - Email Correspondence October 2025 to January 2026, # 4 Exhibit D - Email Correspondence and Letters February 2026, # 5 Exhibit E - Email Correspondence January 2026 to April 2026, # 6 Exhibit F - 5-21-25 Letter from Cybermaxx to Transtar, # 7 Exhibit G - Sellers' Representative Letter to Buyer (5.14.2026), # 8 Exhibit H - KS LETT to S. Rosato (Arbiter Fee Shifting) - 5-14-26).(Schlosser, Kevin)
P.I.: Other | New York Eastern
Scheduling Order
SCHEDULING ORDER: The parties are notified that any party seeking to exclude the testimony of an expert pursuant to Rules 702-705 of the Federal Rules of Evidence and the Daubert v. Merrill Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc., 509 U.S. 579 (1993), line of cases shall file a letter requesting a pre-motion conference on the anticipated motion by June 22, 2027. See Individual Rule 5.1. The parties are required to participate, in good faith, in a settlement conference before the assigned magistrate judge prior to initiating any Daubert motion or motion for summary judgment under Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 or, if no such motions are pursued, filing any proposed Joint Pre-Trial Order. See Individual Rule 5.1.1 & 7.1. The parties are required to attend the settlement conference in-person or via video and must plan ahead in order to ensure that this settlement conference occurs before any deadline set by Magistrate Judge Dunst or the undersigned for filing a summary judgment motion or the Joint Pre-Trial Order. Failure to request and attend such a conference precludes a party from filing a motion for summary judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56.Counsel for the parties shall appear for an in-person status conference before Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on July 22, 2027 at 2:00 p.m. in the Alfonse D'Amato Courthouse in Central Islip, Courtroom 1040. Counsel for the parties shall be prepared to discuss trial dates and the arguments set forth in any letters requesting a pre-motion conference on anticipated Daubert and dispositive motions. The parties must work with Magistrate Judge Dunst to ensure the proper and timely filing of the joint pre-trial order and any motions in limine in accordance with the Court's Individual Rules. See Individual Rule 7.Ordered by Judge Nusrat J. Choudhury on 7/8/2026. (MMC)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.