Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Moran Kidd x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Employment | Florida Middle
Order on Motion for Extension of Time to File
ENDORSED ORDER: On August 24, 2026, Defendants filed a Time Sensitive Unopposed Joint Motion for Extension of Time to File Responses to Amended Complaint and Request for Extra Pages ("Motion"). The Motion does not comply with Local Rule 3.01(f). See Local Rule 3.01(f) ("If a party moves for emergency or time-sensitive relief, the title of the motion must include 'emergency' or 'time-sensitive,' and the motion must include an introductory paragraph that explains the nature of the exigency and states the day by which a ruling is requested. The unwarranted designation of a motion as an emergency can result in a sanction."). And to the extent the Motion was designated as time-sensitive because Defendants waited until the afternoon of the date of the already extended deadline, see Doc. 71, to request relief, the parties are cautioned that self-induced time-sensitive requests are discouraged and may be ineffective. Cf. Klinakis v. Altus Jobs, LLC, No. 6:22-cv-1756-RBD-RMN, 2023 WL 9792678, at *5 (M.D. Fla. Oct. 13, 2023); Culliver v. BP Expl. & Prod., Inc., No. 3:21-cv-4942-MCR-HTC, 2023 WL 11992441, at *1 (N.D. Fla. Jan. 19, 2023). The parties shall ensure that future filings fully comply with the Local Rules. In this specific instance, however, the Motion is granted to the extent that (i) Defendants shall have up to and including August 31, 2026, to respond to the 67 amended complaint; and (ii) the Town Defendants (as defined in the Motion) may file a joint, consolidated motion directed to the 67 amended complaint of no more than 35 pages, to which Plaintiff may file a consolidated response of no more than 30 pages. Signed by Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz on 8/24/2026. (NCT)
Extension of Time to File
Time Sensitive MOTION for Extension of Time to File Responses to Amended Complaint and Request for Extra Pages by Randy Anderson, Constangy, Brooks, Smith & Prophete, LLP, Yash Dave, Lawsikia Hodges, Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP, Colin Arvind Thakkar, Town of Orange Park, William Whitson. (Erdelyi, Susan) Motions referred to Magistrate Judge Samuel J. Horovitz.
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.