Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Ruberto Israel x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Defend Trade Secrets Act (of 2016) | Massachusetts
Memorandum & Order
Magistrate Judge Jessica D. Hedges: MEMORANDUM AND ORDER entered. See attachment for full order.For the foregoing reasons: 1. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 61 ) is DENIED as moot as to the dispute regarding the parties' forensic protocol.2. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 61 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as to Sword Bio Document Requests No. 21, 22, and 23. Sword Bio shall produce documents responsive to Requests No. 21 and 22 from the date range of February 28, 2025 through February 28, 2026, and documents responsive to Request No. 23 from the date range of 2023 through the first day of trial in this matter. All documents provided in response to these requests shall be produced on an "attorneys' eyes only" basis. 3. Sword's Bio's motion for protective order (Docket No. 68 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 76 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. SBH need only produce those documents that it had prepared for production in response to Requests No. 4 and 8 from January 2024 through the original subpoena compliance date (December 12, 2025). As to the documents already produced by Aliri, BioAgilytix may rely in this litigation only on those documents that were produced in response to Requests No. 4 and 8 that fall within the timeframe of January 2024 through the original subpoena compliance date (December 12, 2025). 4. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 82 ) is DENIED as moot as to McNally Interrogatory No. 13 and Sword Bio Interrogatories No. 10 and 14. (EZG)
For the foregoing reasons:
1. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 61 ) is DENIED as moot as to the dispute regarding the parties' forensic protocol.2. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 61 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as to Sword Bio Document Requests No. 21, 22, and 23. Sword Bio shall produce documents responsive to Requests No. 21 and 22 from the date range of February 28, 2025 through February 28, 2026, and documents responsive to Request No. 23 from the date range of 2023 through the first day of trial in this matter. All documents provided in response to these requests shall be produced on an "attorneys' eyes only" basis. 3. Sword's Bio's motion for protective order (Docket No. 68 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 76 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. SBH need only produce those documents that it had prepared for production in response to Requests No. 4 and 8 from January 2024 through the original subpoena compliance date (December 12, 2025). As to the documents already produced by Aliri, BioAgilytix may rely in this litigation only on those documents that were produced in response to Requests No. 4 and 8 that fall within the timeframe of January 2024 through the original subpoena compliance date (December 12, 2025). 4. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 82 ) is DENIED as moot as to McNally Interrogatory No. 13 and Sword Bio Interrogatories No. 10 and 14.
2. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 61 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as to Sword Bio Document Requests No. 21, 22, and 23. Sword Bio shall produce documents responsive to Requests No. 21 and 22 from the date range of February 28, 2025 through February 28, 2026, and documents responsive to Request No. 23 from the date range of 2023 through the first day of trial in this matter. All documents provided in response to these requests shall be produced on an "attorneys' eyes only" basis.
3. Sword's Bio's motion for protective order (Docket No. 68 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part and BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 76 ) is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. SBH need only produce those documents that it had prepared for production in response to Requests No. 4 and 8 from January 2024 through the original subpoena compliance date (December 12, 2025). As to the documents already produced by Aliri, BioAgilytix may rely in this litigation only on those documents that were produced in response to Requests No. 4 and 8 that fall within the timeframe of January 2024 through the original subpoena compliance date (December 12, 2025).
4. BioAgilytix's motion to compel (Docket No. 82 ) is DENIED as moot as to McNally Interrogatory No. 13 and Sword Bio Interrogatories No. 10 and 14.
Miller Act | Utah
Order on Motion for Amended Scheduling Order
THIRD ORDER granting 37 Motion for Amended Scheduling Order: Discovery due by 5/3/2027. Motions due by 7/1/2027. Signed by Magistrate Judge Dustin B. Pead on 07/27/2026. (sg)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.