Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Sparacino Pllc x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
890 Other Statutory Actions | Illinois Northern
Minute
MINUTE entry before the Honorable Virginia M. Kendall. The briefing schedule laid out on 6/11/26 at 1466 is updated as outlined in enclosed attachment and Defendants' Motion to reconsider the schedule 1478 is granted in part. The substantive analysis laid out therein has not changed. In its discretion and after oral argument, however, the Court has determined that tweaking the remedy in accordance with Defendants' proposal honors the spirit of that ruling as well as efficient case management principles, while simultaneously ensuring the parties can build a robust record. See Pfeil v. Rogers, 757 F.2d 850, 85758 (7th Cir. 1985) (briefing schedules serve "the purpose of properly framing the issues in allowing the moving party to respond to all of the resisting party's arguments in its reply brief as well as allowing the trial court to organize and control its calendar in an orderly manner"); see also Kyles v. J.K. Guardian Sec. Servs., 236 F.R.D. 400, 402 (N.D. Ill. 2006) ("Underinclusive and skeletal presentations impermissibly shift the responsibility to the court to do the lawyer's work and to explicate the arguments that the briefs have left undeveloped."); United States v. Dunkel, 927 F.2d 955, 956 (7th Cir. 1991) ("Judges are not like pigs, hunting for truffles buried in briefs."). The "careful balancing act" demanded by class certification and complex litigation generally underscores this determination. Arandell Corp. v. Xcel Energy Inc., 149 F.4th 883, 893 (7th Cir. 2025). Mailed notice (Attachments: # 1 Scheduling Order) (lk, ) (Entered: 08/03/2026)
Other Labor Litigation | Colorado
Order on Motion to Amend/Correct/Modify
MINUTE ORDER: The Joint Motion to Amend Scheduling Order, ECF No. 158 , is GRANTED for good cause shown. It is HEREBY ORDERED that the Scheduling Order be amended as follows: Deadline for parties to designate rebuttal experts is August 21, 2026, Deadline to complete expert discovery is October 2, 2026 and Deadline for Parties to notify Court of intent to move for summary judgment is October 13, 2026. Entered by Magistrate Judge Cyrus Y. Chung on 8/3/2026. Text Only Entry (spric)
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.