Case Activity (19586)

1. Order | Filed: September 10, 2026 | Entered: September 10, 2026 Strange v. JRK Property Holdings, Inc. et al

   P.I.: Other | Massachusetts

   Order

   Judge Richard G. Stearns: ELECTRONIC ORDER entered setting pretrial schedule.
   
   Defendant JRK Property Holdings Inc. having filed an Answer to the Complaint and a crossclaim against co-defendant Brookwood Landscape & Stonework, Inc. (the state court record indicates service on Brookwood), the court enters the following pretrial schedule:
   
   Initial disclosures required by Fed. R. Civ. P. 26(a)(1) must be completed by 9/30/26. Motions for leave to Amend Pleadings & Joinder of Parties must be filed by 12/1/26. Without leave of court, the parties are permitted to serve 30 interrogatories, 30 requests for admissions and 30 document requests, to be served within the 30 days of the initial disclosures (by 10/30/26). The court expects responses to be made in thirty days, unless a request for additional time is granted. A party may not notice more than 4 depositions without leave of court on a showing of good cause.
   
   If the parties would like to participate in the court's mediation program, they must notify docket clerk Jacqueline Martin (617-748-4647) by 2/19/27. All fact discovery must be completed no later than 2/26/27.
   
   If dispositive motions are appropriate, they are due by 3/19/27, with Oppositions to dispositive motions due 4/9/27; Reply, if any, by leave of court.
   
   The court notes that, in this session, treating physicians are not required to produce Rule 26 expert reports, rather plaintiff's relevant medical records are produced as part of fact discovery. This responsibility can also be accomplished by plaintiff presenting completed releases for relevant records and providers by 9/30/26 as part of his automatic disclosures. Plaintiff is obligated to supplement these records under the procedural rules with any relevant ongoing treatment.
   If the parties intend to utilize expert(s) (other than treating physicians who have produced their relevant records) they must inform the court no later than 2/19/27 in order for the court to consider whether the expert's expected testimony is relevant and comports with Fed. R. Evid. 702. If so, the court will amend the pretrial schedule.
   
   (MZ)

2. Minutes | Filed: September 09, 2026 | Entered: September 09, 2026 Nadeau et. al. v. Onsite Mammography, LLC

   P.I.: Other | Massachusetts

   Motion Hearing

   Electronic Clerk's Notes for proceedings held before Judge Mark G. Mastroianni: Motion Hearing held on 9/9/2026. (Attorneys present via Zoom Video: Atty Belov, Atty Roddy, Atty Mann, Atty Berk)

   This hearing was held as a hybrid hearing to allow members of the class action as well as any members of the public to attend. For the record, no class members or general public was present, neither on zoom or in-person.

   Court hears arguments re 41 MOTION for Attorney Fees (Plaintiffs' and Class Counsel's Motion for Attorneys' Fees, Costs, and Service Awards) filed by Amy Capodici, Theresa Culver, Carrie Devers, Georgeann Roberts, June Mack, Valerie Hicks, Rose Clarkson, Pamela Silver, 43 MOTION for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement filed by Amy Capodici, Theresa Culver, Carrie Devers, Georgeann Roberts, June Mack, Valerie Hicks, Rose Clarkson, Pamela Silver. Court takes the matter under advisement. A separate order shall issue.

   (Court Reporter: Leigh Gershowitz at Leigh_Gershowitz@mad.uscourts.gov.) (CR)

3. 19584 additional result(s)