Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Searching dockets in Vaughan Demuro x
Alert me of new activity
All Case Activity Alerts Include: Answers, Appeals, Complaints, Motions, Orders, Trial Notes
Civil Rights: Americans with Disabilities - Other | Colorado
Order on Motion to Dismiss Order on Motion for Order
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion [# 23 ] is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motions to Dismiss [# 22 , # 30 ] are GRANTED and Plaintiff's claims are DISMISSED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court shall terminate the Denver City Attorney as a party to this lawsuit. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a Motion for Leave to Amend that complies with Fed. R. Civ. P. 15 and this District's Local Rule 15.1(b) no later than October 2, 2026. Her failure to do so by the deadline will result in closure of this case. Entered by Magistrate Judge Kathryn A. Starnella on 9/11/2026.
For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record.(echa, )
Civil Rights: Other | Colorado
Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge
ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Susan Prose for non-dispositive matters. Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A) and (B) and Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a) and (b), this case is referred to the assigned United States Magistrate Judge to (1) convene a scheduling conference under Fed. R. Civ. P. 16(b) and enter a scheduling order meeting the requirements of Local Civ. R. 16.2, (2) conduct such status conferences and issue such orders necessary for compliance with the scheduling order, including amendments or modifications of the scheduling order upon a showing of good cause, (3) hear and determine pretrial matters, including discovery and other non-dispositive motions, (4) pursuant to Local Civ. R. 16.6 and at the discretion of the Magistrate Judge, convene such early neutral evaluation and/or settlement conferences and direct related procedures as may facilitate resolution of this case without the necessity of a motion or prior authorization of the undersigned. Additionally, the parties are ordered to familiarize themselves with the Uniform Civil Practice Standards of both judicial officers assigned to this case which can be found here. By Judge Charlotte N. Sweeney on 9/11/26. Text Only Entry (jdyne, )
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login
Email (NOTE: Free email domains not supported)
First Name
Last Name
Job Title
Phone
PLEASE NOTE: A verification email will be sent to your address before you can access your trial.
Password (at least 8 characters required)
Confirm Password
Law360 UK may contact you in your professional capacity with information about our other products, services and events that we believe may be of interest.You’ll be able to update your communication preferences via the unsubscribe link provided within our communications.We take your privacy seriously. Please see our Privacy Policy.