Case Activity (743)

1. Minutes | Filed: September 25, 2026 | Entered: September 29, 2026 Marc Pratt v. Edition Management LLC et al

   Civil Rights: Jobs | California Central

   Motion Hearing Remand Case to State Court

   MINUTES OF Motion Hearing held before Judge Andre Birotte Jr. RE: Plaintiff's Motion to Remand 9 . Defendant shall submit supplemental briefing within 60 days of this order to support their amount in controversy claim based on the relevant statute of limitations periods. Plaintiff shall have 30 days to respond to the supplemental brief. After reviewing the supplemental documents, the Court having carefully considered the papers and the evidence submitted by the parties, and having heard the oral argument of counsel, will take the motion under submission. CourtSmart: CS 09/25/2026. (gk)

2. Filed: September 28, 2026 | Entered: September 28, 2026 Casey Adler et al v. Volume Services, Inc. et al

   Labor: Other | California Central

   Text Only Scheduling Notice

   (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE JOINT STATUS REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: In the June 23, 2026, Joint Status Report ("Report" (Dkt. 45 )) filed by the parties, they stated that they had finalized a "Memorandum of Understanding," as to a settlement, and were negotiating the terms of "a long-form settlement agreement." The Report also stated that Plaintiffs "intend to seek approval of the settlement, within the next ninety (90) days." It also states that Plaintiff intend to file an Amended Complaint in Casey Adler v. Volume Services, Inc, San Diego Superior Court, No. 25CU046642N to consolidate there, this action, Casey Adler, et al. v. Volume Services, Inc., et al., No. 2:26-CV-1174-JAK (C.D. Cal.) and others, and then dismiss this action in its entirety without prejudice. Although more than 90 days have passed since the Report was filed, there have been no further filings as to the foregoing matters. Accordingly, on or before October 13, 2026, the parties shall file an updated joint status report as to the foregoing matters, including as to the potential request to dismiss this action without prejudice, and the expected date by which they will do so, and whether they also intend to seek the dismissal of Maria C. Garcia v. Volume Services, Inc., No. 2:25-CV-5964-JAK (C.D. Cal.). Based on a review of the updated report, a determination will be made whether to schedule a status conference.

3. 741 additional result(s)