Intellectual Property

  • March 30, 2026

    Newsom Tightens AI Contract Rules Over Safety Fears

    California Gov. Gavin Newsom on Monday ordered state agencies to strengthen guardrails for all contracts connected to generative AI tools, highlighting what he sees as risks to free speech, voting rights and mass surveillance, and at the same time encouraging statewide adoption of safe forms of the technology. 

  • March 30, 2026

    Verizon Gets T-Mobile Ads Promising $1K In Savings Blocked

    A New York federal judge Monday issued an injunction blocking T-Mobile from running advertisements stating that consumers could save more than $1,000 a year by switching to the carrier, agreeing with Verizon that T-Mobile is pushing a false message and an "apples-to-oranges comparison."

  • March 30, 2026

    Cardi B, Atlantic Defeat IP Lawsuit Over Hit Single 'Enough'

    A Texas federal judge Monday freed Cardi B from a copyright infringement lawsuit claiming she ripped off two music producers' beats to make her 2024 hit "Enough (Miami)," saying the court lacked personal jurisdiction over the rapper, even if she performed many times in the Lone Star State.

  • March 30, 2026

    Don't Set Special IP Rules For 'Skinny Labels,' Justices Told

    Drugmakers, industry groups, hospitals and scholars have urged the U.S. Supreme Court to uphold a decision letting a patent suit proceed over a generic drug using a so-called skinny label, saying the generics company is seeking unwarranted special protections that would upend patent law.

  • March 30, 2026

    Taylor Swift Stole 'Showgirl' TM From OG Showgirl, Suit Says

    A Las Vegas performer on Monday accused Taylor Swift of infringing her long-held "Confessions of a Showgirl" trademark, claiming in California federal court that Swift's "The Life of a Showgirl" album has caused "textbook reverse confusion" and is threatening to erase the performer "from her very own brand."

  • March 30, 2026

    Georgia Firm Says 'Corporate Mole' Aided Archetype Capital Suit

    An Atlanta-area law firm has accused a Nevada litigation funder of using cloak-and-dagger methods and an "attorney turned corporate mole" to steal the firm's toxic tort trade secrets, only to make a "heel turn" and play the victim by suing the law firm last year.

  • March 30, 2026

    X Corp. Invokes Cox Ruling To Challenge Music Copyright Suit

    X Corp. has argued that a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court last week that an internet service provider couldn't be held liable for its customers pirating music should allow it to escape copyright infringement claims in Tennessee federal court from a group of music publishers.

  • March 30, 2026

    X Gets Backup In Fed. Circ. Fight Against $175M Patent Loss

    Patent quality advocacy group Askeladden LLC has backed X Corp.'s Federal Circuit challenge to a loss of more than $175 million that it saw in a patent infringement suit, saying the patented claims at issue should have been found invalid to begin with.

  • March 30, 2026

    Justices Told Fed. Circ. Wrongly Axed Car ID Patent Claims

    A vehicle identification system patent owner wants the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit's reversal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision allowing the company to amend claims in two patents challenged by rideshare giant Lyft.

  • March 30, 2026

    Patent Monetization Co. Looks To Sink $32M Arbitration Award

    A patent monetization firm has sued a litigation funder and law firm Susman Godfrey LLP in Texas federal court, seeking to vacate an arbitration award that it says was riddled with errors.

  • March 30, 2026

    Former Intel Engineer Fights Trade Secret Suit

    A former Intel engineer has asked a Washington federal court to dismiss a lawsuit alleging he stole nearly 18,000 files before his employment was terminated in July, saying he wasn't properly notified of the case and responded promptly when he found out about it.

  • March 30, 2026

    Sanofi Claims IP Life Extension Needed For Double Patenting

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board rightly found a Sanofi patent application shouldn't be rejected for obviousness-type double patenting, as it doesn't improperly extend patent life, the French drugmaker and its allies have told U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires.

  • March 30, 2026

    Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court

    The Delaware Chancery Court's docket this past week featured disputes involving globally recognized companies, high-dollar contract fights, revived claims from the state's high court and the resolution of a closely watched de-SPAC case.

  • March 30, 2026

    Fastener Co. Can't Slip $17K TM Infringement Judgment

    A Pennsylvania federal judge has upheld a $17,000 trademark infringement judgment against industrial fastener company Peninsula Components after it was found liable for using its competitor Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp's "PEM" name in Google Ads, ruling that the defendant presented no compelling reason to erase the verdict.

  • March 30, 2026

    Tilray Accused Of Dodging $11M In Bob Marley Royalties

    Multistate cannabis giant Tilray owes more than $11 million in royalty payments for using Bob Marley's brand in connection with marijuana products, according to a new lawsuit filed in Delaware Chancery Court.

  • March 30, 2026

    Hunter S. Thompson Whiskey Brand Sued Over IG Photos

    The owner of the copyright to pictures taken by Hunter S. Thompson's personal photographer claimed in Colorado federal court Monday that the whiskey brand owned by Thompson's estate violated copyright law by posting some of the photos on their social media.

  • March 30, 2026

    TriZetto's $70M Trade Secret Verdict Upheld, Total Award Cut

    A New York federal judge has upheld a $70 million compensatory damages verdict for the TriZetto Group in a long-running trade secret fight against Syntel Inc., while also cutting punitive damages to about $140 million and awarding TriZetto more than $12 million in attorney fees.

  • March 30, 2026

    Del. Judge Upholds $34M Verdict In Glaucoma Patent Feud

    A Delaware federal judge has affirmed a $34 million verdict against Alcon and related entities for infringing patents covering medical devices to treat glaucoma, disagreeing that Sight Sciences Inc. had failed to show the accused product meets the limitations of the patent claims.

  • March 30, 2026

    Nationwide Need Not Cover Marker Makers' Trade Secret Fight

    Four Nationwide units have no duty to defend a marker manufacturer in an underlying suit by a competitor alleging it colluded with former employees to use trade secrets and other proprietary information, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled.

  • March 30, 2026

    J&J Unit Wants Forensic Exam Of Ex-Director's Devices

    A Johnson & Johnson subsidiary urged a New Jersey federal court to order a former associate director to submit to a court-supervised forensic inspection of any device or account in which she could have stored confidential information it claims she downloaded in order to start her own competing company.

  • March 30, 2026

    Retailers Not Covered In Trademark Infringement Dispute

    An insurer has no duty to defend a home goods retailer accused of using another company's trademark in its online advertising and marketing, an Illinois federal court ruled, finding that the underlying suit does not allege a covered personal and advertising injury.

  • March 30, 2026

    High Court Turns Away CRISPR Patent Validity Dispute

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Agilent Technologies' bid to revive patents on the gene-editing tool CRISPR, which centers on the burden of proof in establishing prior art.

  • March 30, 2026

    Justices Reject TM Appeal Tied To 'Use In Commerce'

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up an appeal challenging a Ninth Circuit ruling that upheld a multimillion-dollar default judgment based largely on statements defendants made in trademark applications.

  • March 27, 2026

    Injunction Constraints Impede Utility Patent Counterfeit Cases

    A Texas federal judge ruled this month that the strongest tool to stop counterfeiters in so-called Schedule A cases doesn't apply to utility patents, which attorneys say cements a long-standing practice of retailers relying on trademarks and design patents.

  • March 27, 2026

    Inventors Back Dolby's Interested-Party High Court Fight

    A group representing inventors and entrepreneurs is supporting Dolby's bid to have the U.S. Supreme Court review a Federal Circuit dismissal of the company's appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceeding it won, citing the importance of knowing which parties are behind a patent challenge.

Expert Analysis

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Intentional Career-Building

    Author Photo

    A successful legal career is built through intention: understanding expectations, assessing strengths honestly and proactively seeking opportunities to grow and cultivating relationships that support your development, say Erika Drous and Hillary Mann at Morrison Foerster.

  • Trending At The PTAB: The Policies That Are Redefining IPR

    Author Photo

    The evolution of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's inter partes review institution regime last year, coupled with the policy considerations behind that evolution, marks a shift toward greater gatekeeping of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's resources and patent enforcement rights, say attorneys at Finnegan.

  • Reviewing 2025's Artificial Intelligence Disputes Over IP

    Author Photo

    2025 brought the first major fair use rulings involving generative artificial intelligence, and in 2026 courts will weigh in on more discovery disputes, renewed motions to dismiss, class certification challenges and fair use defenses that could shape the course of future AI litigation, say attorneys at Debevoise.

  • Trending At The PTAB: The Journey Of IPR Institution In 2025

    Author Photo

    Over the course of 2025, inter partes review institution at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board evolved into a more restrictive, policy-driven regime with reshaped discretionary briefing and assessment, and increasing procedural requirements, say attorneys at Finnegan.

  • 4 Developments That Defined The 2025 Ethics Landscape

    Author Photo

    The legal profession spent 2025 at the edge of its ethical comfort zone as courts, firms and regulators confronted how fast-moving technologies and new business models collide with long-standing professional duties, signaling that the profession is entering a period of sustained disruption that will continue into 2026, says Hilary Gerzhoy at HWG Law.

  • 5 Trade Secret Developments To Follow In 2026

    Author Photo

    Watch for major developments in trade secret law this year, especially as courts clarify the reach of U.S. law internationally, the availability of trade secret damages and more, say attorneys at Faegre Drinker.

  • Navigating AI In The Legal Industry

    Author Photo

    As artificial intelligence becomes an increasingly integral part of legal practice, Law360 guest commentary this year examined evolving ethical obligations, how the plaintiffs bar is using AI to level the playing field against corporate defense teams, and the attendant risks of adoption.

  • Opinion

    Judges Carry Onus To Screen Expert Opinions Before Juries

    Author Photo

    Recent Second Circuit arguments in Acetaminophen Products Liability Litigation implied a low bar for judicial gatekeeping of expert testimony, but under amended Rule 702 of the Federal Rules of Evidence, judges must rigorously scrutinize expert opinions before allowing them to reach juries, says Lee Mickus at Evans Fears.

  • Labubu Highlights Evolving IP Strategies In Modern Markets

    Author Photo

    Pop Mart's decision not to pursue U.S. patents for its Labubu plush dolls — relying instead on expressive rights — is rational given the nature of the product and the velocity of the market, and also underscores broader structural issues that may hold the U.S. patent system from keeping pace with modern markets, says Tina Dorr at Barnes & Thornburg.

  • How Fractional GCs Can Manage Risks Of Engagement

    Author Photo

    As more organizations eliminate their in-house legal departments in favor of outsourcing legal work, fractional general counsel roles offer practitioners an engaging and flexible way to practice at a high level, but they can also present legal, ethical and operational risks that must be proactively managed, say attorneys at Boies Schiller.

  • Opinion

    Justices Should Clarify Loper Bright Doctrine Via Patent Case

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Supreme Court should use the Lynk Labs v. Samsung patent case to provide urgently needed guidance on how last year’s Loper Bright decision should be applied to real-world questions of agency authority in the post-Chevron world, says Timothy Hsieh at Oklahoma City University School of Law.

  • 7 Strategies To Optimize Impact Of Direct Examination

    Author Photo

    Direct examination is a make-or-break opportunity to build a witness’s credibility, so attorneys should adopt a few tactics — from asking so-called trust-fall questions to preemptively addressing weaknesses — to drive impact and retention with the fact-finder, says Allison Rocker at Baker McKenzie.

  • Series

    Nature Photography Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Nature photography reminds me to focus on what is in front of me and to slow down to achieve success, and, in embracing the value of viewing situations through different lenses, offers skills transferable to the practice of law, says Brian Willett at Saul Ewing.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Practical Problem Solving

    Author Photo

    Issue-spotting skills are well honed in law school, but practicing attorneys must also identify clients’ problems and true goals, and then be able to provide solutions, says Mary Kate Hogan at Quarles & Brady.

  • Intellectual Property Challenges In AI-Driven Drug Discovery

    Author Photo

    Given the adoption of artificial intelligence-based drug discovery platforms and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's recent guidance on determining inventorship in AI-assisted inventions, practitioners must consider unprecedented questions regarding inventorship, patentability standards and infringement liability, says Paul Calvo at Sterne Kessler.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.