Intellectual Property

  • March 30, 2026

    X Gets Backup In Fed. Circ. Fight Against $175M Patent Loss

    Patent quality advocacy group Askeladden LLC has backed X Corp.'s Federal Circuit challenge to a loss of more than $175 million that it saw in a patent infringement suit, saying the patented claims at issue should have been found invalid to begin with.

  • March 30, 2026

    Justices Told Fed. Circ. Wrongly Axed Car ID Patent Claims

    A vehicle identification system patent owner wants the U.S. Supreme Court to review the Federal Circuit's reversal of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's decision allowing the company to amend claims in two patents challenged by rideshare giant Lyft.

  • March 30, 2026

    Patent Monetization Co. Looks To Sink $32M Arbitration Award

    A patent monetization firm has sued a litigation funder and law firm Susman Godfrey LLP in Texas federal court, seeking to vacate an arbitration award that it says was riddled with errors.

  • March 30, 2026

    Former Intel Engineer Fights Trade Secret Suit

    A former Intel engineer has asked a Washington federal court to dismiss a lawsuit alleging he stole nearly 18,000 files before his employment was terminated in July, saying he wasn't properly notified of the case and responded promptly when he found out about it.

  • March 30, 2026

    Sanofi Claims IP Life Extension Needed For Double Patenting

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board rightly found a Sanofi patent application shouldn't be rejected for obviousness-type double patenting, as it doesn't improperly extend patent life, the French drugmaker and its allies have told U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires.

  • March 30, 2026

    Catching Up With Delaware's Chancery Court

    The Delaware Chancery Court's docket this past week featured disputes involving globally recognized companies, high-dollar contract fights, revived claims from the state's high court and the resolution of a closely watched de-SPAC case.

  • March 30, 2026

    Fastener Co. Can't Slip $17K TM Infringement Judgment

    A Pennsylvania federal judge has upheld a $17,000 trademark infringement judgment against industrial fastener company Peninsula Components after it was found liable for using its competitor Penn Engineering & Manufacturing Corp's "PEM" name in Google Ads, ruling that the defendant presented no compelling reason to erase the verdict.

  • March 30, 2026

    Tilray Accused Of Dodging $11M In Bob Marley Royalties

    Multistate cannabis giant Tilray owes more than $11 million in royalty payments for using Bob Marley's brand in connection with marijuana products, according to a new lawsuit filed in Delaware Chancery Court.

  • March 30, 2026

    Hunter S. Thompson Whiskey Brand Sued Over IG Photos

    The owner of the copyright to pictures taken by Hunter S. Thompson's personal photographer claimed in Colorado federal court Monday that the whiskey brand owned by Thompson's estate violated copyright law by posting some of the photos on their social media.

  • March 30, 2026

    TriZetto's $70M Trade Secret Verdict Upheld, Total Award Cut

    A New York federal judge has upheld a $70 million compensatory damages verdict for the TriZetto Group in a long-running trade secret fight against Syntel Inc., while also cutting punitive damages to about $140 million and awarding TriZetto more than $12 million in attorney fees.

  • March 30, 2026

    Del. Judge Upholds $34M Verdict In Glaucoma Patent Feud

    A Delaware federal judge has affirmed a $34 million verdict against Alcon and related entities for infringing patents covering medical devices to treat glaucoma, disagreeing that Sight Sciences Inc. had failed to show the accused product meets the limitations of the patent claims.

  • March 30, 2026

    Nationwide Need Not Cover Marker Makers' Trade Secret Fight

    Four Nationwide units have no duty to defend a marker manufacturer in an underlying suit by a competitor alleging it colluded with former employees to use trade secrets and other proprietary information, a Pennsylvania federal judge ruled.

  • March 30, 2026

    J&J Unit Wants Forensic Exam Of Ex-Director's Devices

    A Johnson & Johnson subsidiary urged a New Jersey federal court to order a former associate director to submit to a court-supervised forensic inspection of any device or account in which she could have stored confidential information it claims she downloaded in order to start her own competing company.

  • March 30, 2026

    Retailers Not Covered In Trademark Infringement Dispute

    An insurer has no duty to defend a home goods retailer accused of using another company's trademark in its online advertising and marketing, an Illinois federal court ruled, finding that the underlying suit does not allege a covered personal and advertising injury.

  • March 30, 2026

    High Court Turns Away CRISPR Patent Validity Dispute

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday rejected Agilent Technologies' bid to revive patents on the gene-editing tool CRISPR, which centers on the burden of proof in establishing prior art.

  • March 30, 2026

    Justices Reject TM Appeal Tied To 'Use In Commerce'

    The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday declined to take up an appeal challenging a Ninth Circuit ruling that upheld a multimillion-dollar default judgment based largely on statements defendants made in trademark applications.

  • March 27, 2026

    Injunction Constraints Impede Utility Patent Counterfeit Cases

    A Texas federal judge ruled this month that the strongest tool to stop counterfeiters in so-called Schedule A cases doesn't apply to utility patents, which attorneys say cements a long-standing practice of retailers relying on trademarks and design patents.

  • March 27, 2026

    Inventors Back Dolby's Interested-Party High Court Fight

    A group representing inventors and entrepreneurs is supporting Dolby's bid to have the U.S. Supreme Court review a Federal Circuit dismissal of the company's appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board proceeding it won, citing the importance of knowing which parties are behind a patent challenge.

  • March 27, 2026

    Hemp Co. Seeks To Cancel Popular 'Lost Mary' Vape TM

    A North Carolina hemp provider is looking to cancel the popular "Lost Mary" vape trademark, held by the Chinese company that also sells Elf Bars, telling a California federal court that it was always invalid because it's illegal to sell flavored vapes.

  • March 27, 2026

    NCAA's Anti-Sports Betting Stance Becomes An IP Issue

    The National Collegiate Athletic Association has kicked off a legal battle with a trademark infringement lawsuit against DraftKings for using terms like "March Madness" to describe the basketball competition, bringing the issue of sports betting to court and signaling a more active role in intellectual property enforcement.

  • March 27, 2026

    Eli Lilly Keeps Most Of Weight Loss Drug Copy Suit Alive

    A California federal judge has refused to throw out a lawsuit accusing a pair of telehealth companies of making copies of Eli Lilly's obesity and type 2 diabetes drugs but agreed to trim the case.

  • March 27, 2026

    ITC Will Review Solar Cell Imports For Infringement

    The U.S. International Trade Commission is launching an investigation into claims by an Arizona-based solar company accusing nearly 50 companies of importing solar cells into the U.S. that infringe one of its patents.

  • March 27, 2026

    NC Biz Court Bulletin: Judge Exits, Duke Ducks Climate Suit

    The North Carolina Business Court saw an unexpected shakeup with one judge's retirement, rendered a pivotal decision in a first-of-its-kind climate change case against Duke Energy and oversaw a trial between the feuding owners of a commercial bed skirt company.

  • March 27, 2026

    Skull Shaver Can't Stop NJ Judge From Moving IP Suit To NC

    A New Jersey federal judge has adopted the recommendation of a magistrate judge who said Skull Shaver's patent infringement case against The Cut Buddy over electronic razor technology could move to North Carolina federal court.

  • March 27, 2026

    Nobel Prize Winners Again Lose Patent Fight Over CRISPR

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has ruled against a pair of Nobel Prize-winning scientists in a patent dispute over who was the first to invent key aspects of the gene-editing technology CRISPR, siding again with a rival team from the Broad Institute and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Expert Analysis

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Practical Problem Solving

    Author Photo

    Issue-spotting skills are well honed in law school, but practicing attorneys must also identify clients’ problems and true goals, and then be able to provide solutions, says Mary Kate Hogan at Quarles & Brady.

  • Intellectual Property Challenges In AI-Driven Drug Discovery

    Author Photo

    Given the adoption of artificial intelligence-based drug discovery platforms and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's recent guidance on determining inventorship in AI-assisted inventions, practitioners must consider unprecedented questions regarding inventorship, patentability standards and infringement liability, says Paul Calvo at Sterne Kessler.

  • Software Patents May Face New Eligibility Scrutiny

    Author Photo

    November guidance from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, along with recent litigation trends from the Federal Circuit, may encourage new challenges in the USPTO and district courts to artificial intelligence and software patents that rely on generic computing functions without concrete details, say attorneys at Venable.

  • Opinion

    A Uniform Federal Rule Would Curb Gen AI Missteps In Court

    Author Photo

    To address the patchwork of courts’ standing orders on generative artificial intelligence, curbing abuses and relieving the burden on judges, the federal judiciary should consider amending its civil procedure rules to require litigants to certify they’ve reviewed legal filings for accuracy, say attorneys at Shook Hardy.

  • Riding The Changing Winds For AI Innovations At The USPTO

    Author Photo

    As recent U.S. Patent and Trademark Office moves reshape how artificial intelligence inventions will be examined and put them on firmer eligibility footing, practitioners need to consider how this shift is both an opportunity and a challenge, say Ryan Phelan at Marshall Gerstein and attorney Mark Campagna.

  • Series

    The Law Firm Merger Diaries: Integrating Practice Groups

    Author Photo

    Enacting unified leadership and consistent client service standards ensures law firm practice groups connect and collaborate around shared goals, turning a law firm merger into a platform for growth rather than a period of disruption, says Brian Catlett at Fennemore Craig.

  • Tapping Into Jurors' Moral Intuitions At Trial

    Author Photo

    Many jurors approach trials with foundational beliefs about fairness, harm and responsibility that shape how they view evidence and arguments, so attorneys must understand how to frame a case in a way that appeals to this type of moral reasoning, says Steve Wood at Courtroom Sciences.

  • Patent Disclaimers Ruling Offers Restriction Practice Insights

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Focus Products v. Kartri confirms that prosecution disclaimers can extend to examiner-defined species in restriction practice, making it important for patent practitioners to manage restriction requirement responses carefully to avoid unintended claim scope limitations, say attorneys at BCLP.

  • Opinion

    Supreme Court Term Limits Would Carry Hidden Risk

    Author Photo

    While proposals for limiting the terms of U.S. Supreme Court justices are popular, a steady stream of relatively young, highly marketable ex-justices with unique knowledge and influence entering the marketplace of law and politics could create new problems, say Michael Broyde at Emory University and Hayden Hall at the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware.

  • Series

    Knitting Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Stretching my skills as a knitter makes me a better antitrust attorney by challenging me to recalibrate after wrong turns, not rush outcomes, and trust that I can teach myself the skills to tackle new and difficult projects — even when I don’t have a pattern to work from, says Kara Kuritz at V&E.

  • Eveready Vs. Squirt: How Trademark Surveys Fare In 9th Circ.

    Author Photo

    An analysis of how two consumer surveys for measuring confusion in trademark disputes perform in the Ninth Circuit across pivotal points in trademark cases' progression reveals insights not only on how the two formats stack up against each other, but also how to maximize a survey's effectiveness, say attorneys at Dorsey.

  • Series

    The Biz Court Digest: Welcome To Miami

    Author Photo

    After nearly 20 years in operation, the Miami Complex Business Litigation Division is a pioneer upon which other jurisdictions in the state have been modeled, adopting many innovations to keep its cases running more efficiently and staffing experienced judges who are accustomed to hearing business disputes, say attorneys at King & Spalding.

  • Identifying And Resolving Conflicts Among Class Members

    Author Photo

    As the Fifth Circuit's recent decision in Nova Scotia Health Employees' Pension Plan v. McDermott International illustrates, intraclass conflicts can determine the fate of a class action — and such conflicts can be surprisingly difficult to identify, says Andrew Faisman, a clerk at the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York.

  • 6 Ways To Nuke-Proof Litigation As Explosive Verdicts Rise

    Author Photo

    As the increasing number of nuclear verdicts continues to reshape the litigation landscape, counsel must understand how to create a multipronged defense strategy to anticipate juror expectations and mitigate the risk of outsize jury awards, say attorneys at Norton Rose.

  • What Law Firm Liability Risks In 2025 Signal For Year To Come

    Author Photo

    Trends and statistics reveal that law firms of all sizes and practice areas remained attractive litigation targets this year, so firms must take concrete steps to avoid professional liability risks in the year to come, say Douglas Richmond and Andrew Ricke at Lockton Companies.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.