Intellectual Property

  • November 20, 2025

    Invisalign-Maker's Sweetened $32M Antitrust Payout OK'd

    A California federal judge who previously rejected Invisalign-maker Align Technology's $27.5 million antitrust deal with SmileDirectClub buyers because it included a coupon program said Thursday he will approve a revised deal, which provides for an all-cash $31.75 million payout.

  • November 20, 2025

    New Trial Bid Denied After $57M Coal Emissions IP Verdict

    A Delaware federal magistrate judge won't order a new trial after a jury found in 2024 that companies affiliated with CERT Operations owed Midwest Energy Emissions Corp. more than $57 million for infringing patents on technology for refining coal to reduce mercury in emissions from power plants.

  • November 20, 2025

    PTAB Upholds Corteva's Patent For Insect-Repellent Corn

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has upheld the entirety of a Corteva Agriscience LLC unit's patent directed to an insect-repellent corn plant, following a challenge from Inari Agriculture Inc.

  • November 20, 2025

    USPTO Decries Instacart's 'Road Mapping' Claim At Fed. Circ.

    The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office is urging the Federal Circuit to turn away Instacart's challenge to the agency's relatively new procedures for discretionarily denying Patent Trial and Appeal Board petitions, noting the court recently rejected three similar bids.

  • November 20, 2025

    Trump Admin Defends Ending Patent, Weather Unions' Rights

    The Trump administration has implored a D.C. federal judge to reject an effort by unions representing workers at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office and the National Weather Service to halt an executive order ending their collective bargaining rights, emphasizing the action is within the president's authority.

  • November 20, 2025

    Thomson Reuters Balks At AI Co.'s Fair Use Appeal

    Thomson Reuters wants the Third Circuit to back a district court's decision that an artificial intelligence-powered legal search engine's use of Westlaw headnotes did not constitute fair use, saying the AI company "pilfered" copyrightable content to make a competing business.

  • November 20, 2025

    Where Apple And Masimo's Watch Patent Fight Stands Now

    The high-octane fight between Apple and Masimo over smartwatch patents escalated again last week, when a California federal jury hit Apple with a $634 million infringement verdict and the U.S. International Trade Commission agreed to assess whether its redesigned products infringe Masimo's patents.

  • November 20, 2025

    1st Circ. Tosses Challenge To Maine Lobster Boat Tracking

    The First Circuit has declined to revive a case brought by several Maine lobstermen who said their privacy rights were violated by the state's tracking of their vessels, ruling that the tracking devices were part of administrative searches of a closely regulated industry and do not violate the Fourth Amendment.

  • November 20, 2025

    Ramey Ordered To Pay $95K For Sharing Netflix Info

    A California federal judge has ordered patent firm Ramey LLP and its founder to pay Netflix $95,000 in attorney fees for violating a court protective order by sharing confidential documents with a third-party litigation funder.

  • November 20, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Shoots Down Bot Patent Claim In Google Challenge

    The Federal Circuit on Thursday reversed the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's finding that upheld one of the claims in a Nobots LLC's bot-detecting patent challenged by Google, finding that the PTAB incorrectly interpreted the claim.

  • November 20, 2025

    MVP: Latham's Mike Morin

    Mike Morin of Latham & Watkins LLP guided Sarepta Therapeutics to winning a $115 million judgment in a patent dispute with Nippon Shinyaku Co. Ltd., and led an Abbott Laboratories unit to a victory in a patent suit against Dexcom Inc., earning him a spot as one of the 2025 Law360 Intellectual Property MVPs.

  • November 20, 2025

    Turning Point Loses Fee Bid In Trump Campaign Music Suit

    A Georgia federal judge refused to grant Turning Point Action's request for attorney fees after it beat copyright claims tied to music played at President Donald Trump's 2024 campaign events, finding the lawsuit wasn't frivolous or filed in bad faith.

  • November 20, 2025

    Warner Music, Udio Settle AI Music Copyright Suit

    Warner Music Group and artificial intelligence music generator Udio said they settled claims that Udio had used copyrighted music to train its AI models and announced a collaboration to create a licensed AI music service.

  • November 20, 2025

    State Of NIL Play At High Schools

    An Ohio state judge's temporary halt of a policy barring name, image and likeness compensation for high school athletes may have the domino effect of wiping out the ban in the handful of states that still have it. Here, Law360 takes a look at the holdout states and the legislative and bylaw changes they are contemplating to lift the ban.

  • November 19, 2025

    Libby Parent Accuses OpenAI Of Infringing TM With Sora App

    OverDrive Inc., the company behind the popular library app Libby, has accused OpenAI's Sora app of infringing its student library app Sora, claiming that it damages the integrity of its brand and could confuse and harm the children who use its collection of ebooks, audiobooks and read-alongs.

  • November 19, 2025

    Anthropic Judge Says Deal Notices Downplay Opt-Out Avenue

    A California federal judge has ordered changes to the notice emails being sent to members of a class of writers who secured a $1.5 billion settlement of copyright infringement claims against artificial intelligence firm Anthropic, saying the current wording does not give "equal dignity" to the option of opting out of the settlement versus filing a claim.

  • November 19, 2025

    'Call Your Mother' Deli Kvetches About 'Bubbi' In TM Suit

    Call Your Mother, a Washington, D.C., bagel and deli shop with 21 locations, has slapped a federal lawsuit against a New Jersey deli named Call Your Bubbi, saying the names are "confusingly similar," and the trademark infringement is willful.

  • November 19, 2025

    Texas Judge Cements VidStream's $105M Trial Win Against X

    A Texas federal judge has locked in VidStream LLC's $105 million infringement trial victory against X Corp. and topped it off with an additional $67 million in interest, but he shot down a series of requests for more damages and relief.

  • November 19, 2025

    Samsung Settles ITC Trade Secrets Case Against BOE

    South Korea-based Samsung Display Co. Ltd. has reached a deal to end allegations at the U.S. International Trade Commission that China's BOE Technology misappropriated its trade secrets for device screens.

  • November 19, 2025

    Whirlpool Sues Rivals To End Import Of 'Copycat' Microwaves

    Whirlpool Corp. on Tuesday urged the U.S. International Trade Commission to block imports of certain Samsung, LG, Haier and other rival brand microwaves, claiming the companies infringed several of its patents for its combination hood microwaves.

  • November 19, 2025

    EDTX Jury Awards $907K In Videoconference Patent Trial

    A federal jury in Texas on Wednesday awarded technology company Barco just over $907,000 as part of a case that had alleged Yealink Network Technology infringed its ClickShare videoconferencing patents.

  • November 19, 2025

    Latham DQ'd From Sleep Apnea Device Co.'s Patent Fight

    A Delaware federal court has disqualified Latham & Watkins LLP from representing the creator of a sleep apnea implant in its patent dispute after the firm served as counsel to the rival's underwriters, saying the "appearance of impropriety is glaring."

  • November 19, 2025

    In-House Atty From Teva Joins Spencer Fane's DC Office

    A former associate general counsel of Teva Pharmaceuticals, an Israel-headquartered biopharmaceutical company, is returning to private practice with Spencer Fane LLP, where he will work as a partner with the firm's intellectual property practice group, according to a Monday announcement.

  • November 19, 2025

    MVPs: Kirkland's Adam Alper And Michael De Vries

    Adam Alper and Michael De Vries of Kirkland & Ellis LLP won a $25 million verdict in patent litigation over a promising fecal transplant technology and are representing Motorola in a blockbuster intellectual property case, earning them a spot among the 2025 Law360 Intellectual Property MVPs.

  • November 19, 2025

    Campbell's Wants $17M Soup Rack Patent Verdict Tossed

    Soup giant Campbell's has asked an Illinois federal judge to throw out a $17.3 million jury verdict that found it had infringed patents related to gravity-operated racks in grocery aisles, saying the racks "indisputably" contain unpatentable elements.

Expert Analysis

  • Future-Proof Patent Law By Starting Talent Pipelines Early

    Author Photo

    Law firms struggling with a narrow talent pipeline in the intellectual property space should consider beginning their recruitment strategies for potential candidates as early as high school, and raise awareness for career opportunities that do not require a law degree, says Christine Hollis at Marshall Gerstein.

  • Demystifying The Civil Procedure Rules Amendment Process

    Author Photo

    Every year, an advisory committee receives dozens of proposals to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most of which are never adopted — but a few pointers can help maximize the likelihood that an amendment will be adopted, says Josh Gardner at DLA Piper.

  • How USPTO Examiner Memo Informs Software Patent Drafting

    Author Photo

    A memorandum recently released by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office provides useful clues as to how the USPTO and examining corps will evaluate claims in software-implemented inventions for subject matter eligibility going forward, says Michael Lew at Squire Patton.

  • FTC, CoStar Cases Against Zillow May Have Broad Impact

    Author Photo

    Zillow's partnerships with Redfin and Realtor.com have recently triggered dual fronts of legal scrutiny — an antitrust inquiry from the Federal Trade Commission and a mass copyright infringement suit from CoStar — raising complex questions that reach beyond real estate, says Shubha Ghosh at Syracuse University College of Law.

  • Parenting Skills That Can Help Lawyers Thrive Professionally

    Author Photo

    As kids head back to school, the time is ripe for lawyers who are parents to consider how they can incorporate their parenting skills to build a deep, meaningful and sustainable legal practice, say attorneys at Alston & Bird.

  • Enablement Standard Insights From Fed. Circ. Agilent Ruling

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent enablement standard decision in Agilent v. Synthego underscores three critical takeaways for patent practitioners, including reaffirmation that the enablement inquiry under Section 102 of the Patent Act is distinct from the inquiry under Section 112, say attorneys at MoFo.

  • How WTO's Anti-Suit Injunction Ruling Affects IP Stakeholders

    Author Photo

    The World Trade Organization's recent ruling in favor of the European Union's challenge to Chinese courts' anti-suit injunction practices should hearten holders of standard-essential patents, while implementers can take solace that they retain mechanisms to distinguish the WTO decision when seeking anti-suit injunctions in U.S. courts, says Michael Franzinger at Dentons.

  • Series

    Teaching Trial Advocacy Makes Us Better Lawyers

    Author Photo

    Teaching trial advocacy skills to other lawyers makes us better litigators because it makes us question our default methods, connect to young attorneys with new perspectives and focus on the needs of the real people at the heart of every trial, say Reuben Guttman, Veronica Finkelstein and Joleen Youngers.

  • Why Civil RICO Claims Are Gaining Traction With Plaintiffs

    Author Photo

    A Texas federal court's recent $71 million verdict in Point Bridge Capital v. Johnson demonstrates that, when used properly, civil lawsuits under the Racketeering Influenced and Corrupt Organizations Act can be a devastating weapon — and increasingly favorable for plaintiffs, says Akiva Shapiro at Gibson Dunn.

  • You're Out?: Rooftop Views Of Sports Games Raise IP Issues

    Author Photo

    A high-profile dispute between the Chicago Cubs and a rooftop business adjacent to Wrigley Field strikes at the intersection of sports, intellectual property and Chicago neighborhood tradition, highlighting novel questions that could significantly affect IP rights in the context of live events generally, say attorneys at Troutman Pepper.

  • 5 Key Steps To Prepare For Oral Arguments

    Author Photo

    Whether presenting oral arguments before the U.S. Supreme Court or a local county judge, effective preparation includes the same essential ingredients, from organizing arguments in blocks to maximizing the potential of mock exercises, says Allison Rocker at Baker McKenzie.

  • A Change In Big Pharma Response To FTC Delisting Warnings

    Author Photo

    While the effect of Federal Trade Commission notices to pharmaceutical companies about allegedly improper patent listings in the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's Orange Book had been de minimis through the end of last year, July data shows an increase in delistings, say Ratib Ali and Celia Lu at Competition Dynamics.

  • 9th Circ. Finding That NFTs Are Goods Will Change TM Law

    Author Photo

    The Ninth Circuit's recent ruling in Yuga Labs v. Ripps establishes that NFTs have real, commercial value under U.S. federal trademark law, a new legal precedent that may significantly influence intellectual property enforcement and marketplace policies regarding digital assets going forward, say attorneys at Wilson Elser.

  • Series

    Adapting To Private Practice: From Texas AUSA To BigLaw

    Author Photo

    As I learned when I transitioned from an assistant U.S. attorney to a BigLaw partner, the move from government to private practice is not without its hurdles, but it offers immense potential for growth and the opportunity to use highly transferable skills developed in public service, says Jeffery Vaden at Bracewell.

  • Data Undermines USPTO's 'Settled Expectations' Doctrine

    Author Photo

    An analysis of inter partes review proceedings filed since 2012 appears to refute the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's recent stance that patent owners develop a strong settled expectation that their patents will not be challenged after being in force for six years, say Jonathan DeFosse and Samuel Smith at Sheppard Mullin, and Kenzo Kasai at NGB Corp.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.