Intellectual Property

  • August 12, 2025

    Cherry Growers Settle Patent Suit With Canadian Gov't

    The Canadian government has inked deals with two groups of cherry growers it had accused in a Washington federal court of infringing its intellectual property rights over the Staccato cherry variety.

  • August 12, 2025

    BREAKING: Trump Taps Judicial Noms For Miss., Alabama Trial Courts

    President Donald Trump announced five judicial nominees for federal courts in Mississippi and Alabama, one of whom Trump tried to put on the bench in his first term.

  • August 12, 2025

    ITC Bans Pilates Machine Imports After Default In Patent Case

    The U.S. International Trade Commission on Monday issued a complete block on imports of Pilates reformers that infringe a pair of patents owned by Balanced Body, which brought a case at the ITC against a group of mostly China-based companies.

  • August 12, 2025

    AT&T, T-Mobile Settle Patent Suit After $175M Verizon Verdict

    AT&T Inc. and T-Mobile agreed on Tuesday to resolve patent infringement claims brought by Headwater Research LLC related to wireless communications technology after a federal jury last month said Verizon owed $175 million for infringing two patents belonging to Headwater.

  • August 12, 2025

    Architect Claims NC Builder Never Paid For Home Designs

    A South Carolina architect has argued in a North Carolina federal lawsuit that a Charlotte, North Carolina, homebuilder solicited a set of plans for a home, then used the designs on a project without paying for them, breaking a verbal agreement between the two companies.

  • August 12, 2025

    Roche Settles Trade Secrets Suit With Stanford And Profs

    Subsidiaries of F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG have settled claims with a competing startup founded by Stanford University professors to resolve claims of trade secret theft related to cancer detection technology.

  • August 12, 2025

    Atty Apologizes For Citation Error In IP Dispute

    A New York attorney who became one of many accused of using generative artificial intelligence for a brief after a federal judge found citations to nonexistent cases apologized Tuesday for a mistake in a more recent brief flagged for a false citation.

  • August 12, 2025

    Philly Lawyer Accuses Rival Firm Of Misusing 'We Win' TM

    A Philadelphia-based personal injury lawyer claims a rival firm has been using his trademark protected phrase, "We Win or It's Free," to market its services without his authorization for more than four years, according to a recent federal court complaint.

  • August 12, 2025

    MGA Wants Judge To Rule On Punitive Damages In TI Case

    Toy maker MGA Entertainment has asked a California federal judge to decide how much it owes in punitive damages for infringement of trade dress co-owned by rapper Clifford "TI" Harris and his wife, Tameka "Tiny" Harris, relating to Tiny Harris' pop group the OMG Girlz, instead of holding the case's fourth jury trial.

  • August 12, 2025

    Software Co. Says Exec's New AI Job Breaches Noncompete

    Software-as-a-service firm Anaplan Inc. says a recently promoted vice president who oversaw development of its "first to market" artificial intelligence enterprise planning tool CoModeler has breached noncompete and nonsolicitation agreements by jumping to a direct competitor.

  • August 12, 2025

    Disney Accuses InterDigital Of Monopolizing Video Tech

    Disney has launched an antitrust lawsuit in Delaware federal court accusing wireless technology company InterDigital Inc. of using its patents to create a monopoly on the market for technology necessary for streaming services.

  • August 11, 2025

    Justices Told USAA's $218M Win Threatened By Inconsistency

    The Federal Circuit's decision to let the Patent Trial and Appeal Board invalidate patents at the heart of the United Services Automobile Association's recently reversed $218 million infringement verdict against PNC Bank, endorsed allowing government agencies to issue contradictory rulings without explaining themselves, USAA has told the U.S. Supreme Court.

  • August 11, 2025

    $63M Trade Secrets Suit Over DOD Software Axed

    A Virginia federal judge Monday axed what remained of a former technology company employee's lawsuit seeking $63 million over claims that unauthorized copies of his software were used to develop an alternative software for the U.S. Department of Defense. 

  • August 11, 2025

    Chicago Judge Signals Shift In Handling Counterfeit Cases

    A Chicago federal judge, who earlier this year halted lawsuits in his courtroom that anonymously combined numerous alleged online counterfeiters in single complaints, has concluded that the litigation strategy "should no longer be perpetuated in its present form."

  • August 11, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Reverses Alice Ax Of Dumbbell Patent In IFit Case

    The Federal Circuit decided on Monday that a Utah federal judge wrongly declared a PowerBlock Holdings Inc. dumbbell patent asserted against iFit Inc. to be invalid for claiming only an abstract idea, holding it instead covers a specific type of dumbbell that is patent eligible.

  • August 11, 2025

    Licensing Co. Seeks Revival Of Leibovitz Photo Dispute

    The licensing firm for photographer Annie Leibovitz urged the Eleventh Circuit Monday to revive its suit alleging that an online magazine used her photos without permission, arguing that carveouts in the agreement letting Leibovitz use her work for select purposes doesn't undermine the exclusivity of the company's rights.

  • August 11, 2025

    Boston U. Hit With TM Suit From Baylor Over Logo

    Baylor University says its trademark rights on its interlocking "BU" logo are being infringed by Boston University and the Massachusetts school's use of the mark will cause confusion in the marketplace.

  • August 11, 2025

    Apple Prevails In Heartbeat Patent Suit On Standing, Invalidity

    A New York federal judge has tossed a New York University cardiologist's lawsuit alleging an Apple Watch feature that monitors and detects irregular heartbeats infringes his patent, siding with a magistrate judge's finding that he lacks standing and the patent is invalid.

  • August 11, 2025

    IP Atty Asks High Court To Hear 'US Space Force' TM Case

    An intellectual property lawyer has urged the U.S. Supreme Court to hear his case to register the trademark "US Space Force," seeking a reversal of a trademark board decision that denied him registration of the mark even though he applied for it before the creation of the military branch with the same name.

  • August 11, 2025

    Photographer Says Media Co. Misued His Bitcoin Photo

    A professional photographer sued financial media company Benzinga on Monday in Michigan federal court, accusing it of wrongfully using one of his copyrighted photos featuring bitcoin iconography in its online content.

  • August 11, 2025

    AI Firm Anthropic Can't Get Pause For Early Fair Use Appeal

    A California federal judge on Monday denied a request from artificial intelligence firm Anthropic to pause a case over its use of books to train its large language model so it could appeal a ruling saying a jury would decide whether damages were warranted for the company's use of pirated works.

  • August 11, 2025

    Calif. Judge Shuts Off Some Netflix Patent Claims In Suit

    A California federal judge has narrowed Netflix's lawsuit accusing Broadcom of ripping off five software patents, tossing some patent claims for good while giving the streaming company the ability to amend others.

  • August 11, 2025

    Levi Strauss Sues NotSoNormal Over Alleged TM Infringement

    Levi Strauss & Co. has launched a trademark infringement action against a Los Angeles-based retailer it accuses of selling reworked versions of its apparel products for hundreds of dollars, according to a complaint in California federal court.

  • August 11, 2025

    Weil Brings On Another IP Litigation Duo From Latham

    Weil Gotshal & Manges LLP announced Monday that it has hired more attorneys from Latham & Watkins LLP, this time bringing on two intellectual property attorneys in Boston and San Francisco on the heels of other recent additions from the firm.

  • August 08, 2025

    Trump Admin Threatens To Take Harvard's Patents

    The U.S. Department of Commerce on Friday threatened to invoke the government's so-called march-in rights to take control of patents owned by Harvard University, accusing the Ivy League institution of not meeting its obligations tied to federally funded research.

Expert Analysis

  • Opinion

    Bar Exam Reform Must Expand Beyond A Single Updated Test

    Author Photo

    Recently released information about the National Conference of Bar Examiners’ new NextGen Uniform Bar Exam highlights why a single test is not ideal for measuring newly licensed lawyers’ competency, demonstrating the need for collaborative development, implementation and reform processes, says Gregory Bordelon at Suffolk University.

  • The Patent Eligibility Eras Tour: 11 Years Of Post-Alice Tumult

    Author Photo

    A survey of recent twists and turns in patent eligibility law highlights the confusion created by the U.S. Supreme Court's 2014 Alice decision and reveals that the continually shifting standards have begun to diverge in fundamental ways between the Federal Circuit and the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, says Michael Shepherd at Fish & Richardson.

  • Export Misconduct Resolutions Emphasize BIS, DOJ Priorities

    Author Photo

    The U.S. Department of Justice's and Bureau of Industry and Security's recently resolved parallel enforcement actions against semiconductor technology company Cadence Design demonstrate the agencies' prioritization of penalties for export control violations involving China, as well as the importance of voluntary self-disclosure, say attorneys at Fenwick.

  • Disney Art Suit Will Test Recent AI Fair Use Boundaries

    Author Photo

    While the first U.S. rulings to address the issue recently held that it's fair use for generative artificial intelligence models to train on certain copyrighted books without permission, Disney v. Midjourney, filed in June, will test the limits of the fair use framework in a visual art context, says Rob Rosenberg at Moses & Singer.

  • A Simple Way Courts Can Help Attys Avoid AI Hallucinations

    Author Photo

    As attorneys increasingly rely on generative artificial intelligence for legal research, courts should consider expanding online quality control programs to flag potential hallucinations — permitting counsel to correct mistakes and sparing judges the burden of imposing sanctions, say attorneys at Lankler Siffert & Wohl and Connors.

  • Tracking The Evolving Legal Landscape Of Music Festivals

    Author Photo

    The legal infrastructure behind music festivals is anything but simple, so attorneys advising clients in this space should be prepared for a wide range of legal challenges, including the unexpected risks that come with live events, says Meesha Moulton at Meesha Moulton Law.

  • USPTO Ex Parte Reexamination Could Become More Popular

    Author Photo

    As inter partes review becomes less effective for challenging patent validity due to recent changes at the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, ex parte reexamination may provide a viable alternative, with significant cost savings, anonymity and procedural advantages, says Stephen Ball at Husch Blackwell.

  • Series

    Creating Botanical Art Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Pressing and framing plants that I grow has shown me that pursuing an endeavor that brings you joy can lead to surprising benefits for a legal career, including mental clarity, perspective and even a bit of humility, says Douglas Selph at Morris Manning.

  • Reddit v. Anthropic Is A Defining Moment In The AI Data Race

    Author Photo

    The recent lawsuit filed by Reddit against Anthropic in California state court marks a pivotal moment in the burgeoning field of artificial intelligence by sidestepping a typical copyright dispute, focusing instead on the enforceability of online terms of service and ownership of the digital commons, says William Galkin at Galkin Law.

  • Opinion

    The Legal Education Status Quo Is No Longer Tenable

    Author Photo

    As underscored by the fallout from California’s February bar exam, legal education and licensure are tethered to outdated systems, and the industry must implement several key reforms to remain relevant and responsive to 21st century legal needs, says Matthew Nehmer at The Colleges of Law.

  • Opinion

    Calif. Must Amend Trade Secret Civil Procedure

    Author Photo

    A California procedural law that effectively shields trade secret defendants from having to return company materials until the plaintiff can craft detailed requests must be amended to recognize that property recovery and trade secret analysis are distinct issues, says Matthew Miller at Hanson Bridgett.

  • 2nd Circ. Reinforces Consensus On Vacating Foreign Awards

    Author Photo

    In Molecular Dynamics v. Spectrum Dynamics Medical, the Second Circuit recently affirmed that federal district courts do not possess subject matter jurisdiction to vacate foreign arbitral awards, strengthening this consensus across the circuits most active in recognition and enforcement actions, says Ed Mullins at Reed Smith.

  • E-Discovery Quarterly: Rulings On Relevance Redactions

    Author Photo

    In recent cases addressing redactions that parties sought to apply based on the relevance of information — as opposed to considerations of privilege — courts have generally limited a party’s ability to withhold nonresponsive or irrelevant material, providing a few lessons for discovery strategy, say attorneys at Sidley.

  • Opinion

    Section 1983 Has Promise After End Of Nationwide Injunctions

    Author Photo

    After the U.S. Supreme Court recently struck down the practice of nationwide injunctions in Trump v. Casa, Section 1983 civil rights suits can provide a better pathway to hold the government accountable — but this will require reforms to qualified immunity, says Marc Levin at the Council on Criminal Justice.

  • Patent Ambiguity Persists After Justices Nix Eligibility Appeal

    Author Photo

    The Supreme Court recently declined to revisit the contentious framework governing patent eligibility by denying certiorari in Audio Evolution Diagnostics v. U.S., suggesting a necessary recalibration of both patent application and litigation strategies, say attorneys at Skadden.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here