Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Intellectual Property
-
December 04, 2025
Fed. Circ. Mulls If Switching $104M Verdict For $3 Was Fair
The Federal Circuit didn't seem to be buying Versata Software's argument Thursday morning that a Michigan federal judge made a big mistake by clearing a nearly $105 million trade secrets and breach of contract verdict it won against Ford and replacing it with just $3 in damages.
-
December 04, 2025
Insurance Broker Tech Leader Sued In Del. Over Market Power
Alleging potential "mid-nine figures" in damages, insurance broker software venture Ardent Labs Inc. has filed a five-count suit in Delaware's Court of Chancery accusing an industry leader — Applied Systems Inc. — of "anticompetitive conduct that violates the letter and spirit of antitrust law."
-
December 04, 2025
Bobcat Says Caterpillar Reverse-Engineered Loader Parts
Construction equipment maker Doosan Bobcat has accused rival Caterpillar Inc. of breaking down products to look for ways to engineer them, especially skid-steer loaders, excavators and dozers, in a pair of patent infringement lawsuits it brought in Texas federal court and the U.S. International Trade Commission.
-
December 04, 2025
Squires Clarifies Points On Patent Eligibility Declarations
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires is reminding applicants that they can file declarations explaining why their patents are eligible under Section 101 of the Patent Act and that examiners need to consider them when filed.
-
December 04, 2025
Authors' Attys Seek $300M In Fees After $1.5B Anthropic Deal
The attorneys who represented a group of authors that secured a $1.5 billion settlement with artificial intelligence business Anthropic after claiming the company infringed copyrights by training its models with pirated books have asked the court for $300 million in fees.
-
December 04, 2025
NC Court Blocks AI Tech Rollout Amid Trade Secret Dispute
A North Carolina federal judge agreed with Canada-based Atlas Power Technologies Inc. that its multimillion-dollar technology for data centers using artificial intelligence will be endangered by the launch of a parallel product from a board member in coming weeks, granting the company's request for a temporary restraining order.
-
December 04, 2025
Fed. Circ. Prior Art Ruling Conflicts With AIA, Justices Told
The Federal Circuit ruling that the filing date of a patent application dictates whether it can be used as prior art to invalidate a later patent is at odds with the law that created the modern administrative patent review system, one of the law's chief architects told the U.S. Supreme Court this week.
-
December 04, 2025
Traffic Safety Exec Joined Rival After $77K Bonus, Court Told
A traffic safety company has alleged in North Carolina federal court that the person who was in charge of expanding its business in the Southeast resigned just hours after receiving a $77,000 bonus check and took a trove of trade secrets, a slew of employees and customer lists to his new job for a rival.
-
December 04, 2025
Photographer Gets $51K In Copyright Case Against Website
A Manhattan federal judge has ordered the publisher of an online photography magazine to pay $51,000 in total damages and fees to a photographer after the Second Circuit said its publishing of her work was not fair use.
-
December 04, 2025
Foreign Investment Office Leader Joins DLA Piper In DC
The former leader of a Commerce Department office that does national security reviews of foreign investments, and who has more than a decade of working in senior roles in government, has joined DLA Piper LLP's Washington office as a partner, the firm announced Wednesday.
-
December 04, 2025
Ohio Football Player's Mother Drops Suit After NIL Approval
The football player's mother who sued the Ohio High School Athletic Association over a bylaw banning athletes from receiving name, image and likeness compensation dropped the suit after the association recently voted to rescind the ban.
-
December 03, 2025
USPTO Gets Earful On Plan To Restrict Patent Reviews
The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's proposed new rules to limit America Invents Act patent reviews have generated scores of forceful comments, with supporters saying the proposal will curb redundant challenges and opponents arguing it would bar legitimate reviews and exceed the office's power.
-
December 03, 2025
OpenAI Can't Scrap Injunction In TM Suit Over 'IO' Name
OpenAI can't undo an injunction won by IYO Inc. that temporarily blocked it from using the "IO" trademark in certain circumstances involving acquired competitor IO Products, after the Ninth Circuit concluded on Wednesday that the parties' marks only differ by one letter and sell similar AI-related products.
-
December 03, 2025
ITC Judge Finds Innoscience Infringes 1 Of 2 Infineon Patents
A U.S. International Trade Commission judge has found that China-based chipmaker Innoscience infringed upon a patent owned by semiconductor manufacturer Infineon Technologies, though Innoscience says the finding doesn't block it from selling its gallium nitride technology products.
-
December 03, 2025
Kevin O'Leary, Company Execs Fight Patent Forgery Suit
A livestock technology company and several of its executives and investors, including Kevin O'Leary of "Shark Tank," have asked a Colorado federal judge to throw out the lawsuit against them by the company's founder, who claims the defendants stole her company and intellectual property.
-
December 03, 2025
State AGs Condemn College Sports Rule Enforcement Deal
Seven state attorneys general on Wednesday called a proposed contract between NCAA institutions and the commission enforcing new revenue-sharing rules for athletes "cartoonishly villainous," arguing in a letter that it undermines state laws and jeopardizes the rights of athletes and schools.
-
December 03, 2025
Meta Accused Of Stealing Swedish Label's Music A 2nd Time
A Swedish music label has once again accused Meta of copyright infringement, saying the social media giant has not stopped encouraging users to insert its recordings into Reels and other videos on Facebook and Instagram without proper licensing since its first suit was filed.
-
December 03, 2025
Rag & Bone Gets Temporary Relief In Suit Over 'Miramar' Mark
Fashion brand Rag & Bone secured a temporary restraining order on Wednesday against an intellectual property holding company from asserting ownership over a trademark of the term "Miramar," saying Rag & Bone had shown it was likely to suffer irreparable harm without court intervention.
-
December 03, 2025
Novartis, Swiss Marketer Want Out Of Trade Secrets Suit
A Swiss marketing company and its founder have joined pharmaceutical giant Novartis in asking a Manhattan federal judge to release them from a hedge fund's suit accusing the founder of brokering business meetings with Novartis in a scheme to steal its strategy, claiming the suit is merely an attempt to punish Novartis for placing money with a competitor.
-
December 03, 2025
Fed. Circ. Backs Axed Claims In Heart Rate Monitor Patent
The Federal Circuit on Wednesday upheld a Utah federal court's decision that claims in a wireless heart rate monitor patent owned by Finnish sports tech company Polar Electro Oy were invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice test.
-
December 03, 2025
Judge Rejects X's Early Attempt To Block Minn. Deepfake Law
A Minnesota federal judge has denied X Corp.'s request for a favorable ruling in its challenge to a Minnesota state law curtailing the dissemination of "deepfakes" aimed at influencing elections, saying X had not shown that it could be harmed by the law in a manner that would give it standing to block it.
-
December 03, 2025
Nike 'Cool Compression' Case Not Exceptional, 3rd Circ. Told
Nike argued before the Third Circuit on Wednesday that its "cool compression" trademark litigation with clothing maker Lontex Corp. was not so "exceptional" that it should pay Lontex's attorney fees, which exceed $5 million, given that the trial court and Third Circuit had previously held that the Lanham Act case was a close one.
-
December 03, 2025
Sheppard Mullin Lands MoFo IP Atty In Los Angeles
Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP announced Wednesday it has bulked up its intellectual property practice with a Los Angeles-based partner who came aboard from Morrison Foerster LLP.
-
December 03, 2025
Fed. Circ. Pushes DC Circ. Not To Rethink Newman Decision
The Federal Circuit has urged the D.C. Circuit to ignore Federal Circuit Judge Pauline Newman's request to rehear a decision upholding the dismissal of her suit against the colleagues who suspended her, saying the judiciary has the right to police its own internal matters.
-
December 02, 2025
Squires Institutes First PTAB Challenges Since Taking Over
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has instituted four inter partes reviews and two post-grant reviews, the first Patent Trial and Appeal Board challenges to get his sign-off since he took over the institution review process.
Expert Analysis
-
TikTok Divestiture Deal Revolves Around IP Considerations
The divestiture deal between the U.S. and China to resolve a security dispute over TikTok's U.S. operations is seen as a diplomatic breakthrough, but its success hinges on the treatment of intellectual property and may set a precedent in the global contest over digital sovereignty and IP control, say attorneys at Brownstein Hyatt.
-
Trending At The PTAB: A Potential Barrier To Serial Challenges
New rules proposed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office may appear similar to previous rules at first glance, but are actually much broader in how they would limit petitioners' ability to challenge a patent more than once, say attorneys at Finnegan.
-
Fed. Circ. In September: The Printed Matter Doctrine Expands
The Federal Circuit’s recent decision in Bayer v. Mylan represents an extension of the doctrine that adding new words to an existing product or method will not support patentability unless there is a functional relationship, bringing new considerations for both patent holders and challengers, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.
-
10 Quick Tips To Elevate Your Evidence Presentation At Trial
A strong piece of evidence, whether in the form of testimony or exhibit, is wasted if not presented effectively, so attorneys must prepare with precision to help fact-finders both retain the information and internalize its significance, says Allison Rocker at Baker McKenzie.
-
Series
Practicing Stoicism Makes Me A Better Lawyer
Practicing Stoicism, by applying reason to ignore my emotions and govern my decisions, has enabled me to approach challenging situations in a structured way, ultimately providing advice singularly devoted to a client's interest, says John Baranello at Moses & Singer.
-
Broader Eligibility For AI-Related Patents May Be Coming
A series of recent developments from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office appears to signal that claims involving improvement in the operation of a machine learning model are now more likely to be considered patent-eligible, and that patent examiners may focus on questions of novelty and nonobviousness and less so on subject matter eligibility, say attorneys at Kilpatrick.
-
Series
The Biz Court Digest: Texas, One Year In
A year after the Texas Business Court's first decision, it's clear that Texas didn't just copy Delaware and instead built something uniquely its own, combining specialization with constitutional accountability and creating a model that looks forward without losing touch with the state's democratic and statutory roots, says Chris Bankler at Jackson Walker.
-
Series
Law School's Missed Lessons: Educating Your Community
Nearly two decades prosecuting scammers and elder fraud taught me that proactively educating the public about the risks they face and the rights they possess is essential to building trust within our communities, empowering otherwise vulnerable citizens and preventing wrongdoers from gaining a foothold, says Roger Handberg at GrayRobinson.
-
Adapting To USPTO's Reduction Of Examiner Interview Time
Reported changes to the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's examiner performance appraisal plan will likely make interviews scarcer throughout the application process, potentially influencing patent allowance rates and increasing the importance of approaching each interview with a clear agenda and well-defined goals, say attorneys at Polsinelli.
-
What To Know About Interim Licenses In Global FRAND Cases
Recent U.K. court decisions have shaped a framework for interim licenses in global standard-essential patent disputes, under which parties can benefit from operating on temporary terms while a court determines the final fair, reasonable and nondiscriminatory terms — but the future of this developing remedy is in doubt, say attorneys at Fish & Richardson.
-
5 Crisis Lawyering Skills For An Age Of Uncertainty
As attorneys increasingly face unprecedented and pervasive situations — from prosecutions of law enforcement officials to executive orders targeting law firms — they must develop several essential competencies of effective crisis lawyering, says Ray Brescia at Albany Law School.
-
Anticipating FTC's Shift On Unfair Competition Enforcement
As the Federal Trade Commission signals that it will continue to challenge unfair or deceptive acts and practices under Section 5 of the FTC Act, but with higher evidentiary standards, attorneys counseling healthcare, technology, energy or pharmaceuticals clients should note several practice tips, says Thomas Stratmann at George Mason University.
-
Opinion
It's Time For The Judiciary To Fix Its Cybersecurity Problem
After recent reports that hackers have once again infiltrated federal courts’ electronic case management systems, the judiciary should strengthen its cybersecurity practices in line with executive branch standards, outlining clear roles and responsibilities for execution, says Ilona Cohen at HackerOne.
-
Identifying The Sources And Impacts Of Juror Contamination
Jury contamination can be pervasive, so it is important that trial teams be able to spot its sources and take specific mitigation steps, says consultant Clint Townson.
-
Parody Defendants Are Finding Success Post-Jack Daniel's
Recent decisions demonstrate that, although the U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Jack Daniel's v. VIP Products did benefit trademark plaintiffs by significantly limiting the First Amendment expressive use defense, courts also now appear to be less likely to find a parodic work likely to cause confusion, says Andrew Michaels at University of Houston Law Center.