Intellectual Property

  • December 17, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Reverses Injunction After Car Seat IP Trial

    Evenflo Co. Inc. persuaded the Federal Circuit on Wednesday to free it from a Delaware federal court's injunction issued after a jury found it had infringed Wonderland Switzerland AG's car seat patents.

  • December 17, 2025

    ASUSTeK Gets Albright To Send 3 Patent Cases To Calif.

    A Texas federal judge on Wednesday transferred to California a patent owner's suits accusing Taiwanese computer company ASUSTeK of infringing numerous patents, finding the Golden State is the more convenient place for the litigation.

  • December 17, 2025

    Former Analyst For Colo. County Alleges 'Systematic' Bias

    A Colorado county discriminated against one of its senior analysts after she received national recognition for her work and subjected her to escalating retaliatory conduct that culminated in her termination, she told a federal court.

  • December 17, 2025

    Calif. DMV Tells Tesla To Rename Autopilot Or Lose License

    The California DMV has said Tesla violated state law when it marketed its vehicles' "autopilot" and "full self-driving capability," calling the phrases misleading because the technology doesn't actually enable autonomous driving and ordering the company to change its marketing or face a suspension of its permit to sell vehicles in the state.

  • December 17, 2025

    Crypto Card Co. Claims Millions Lost To Counterfeit Scheme

    A Florida-based cryptocurrency trading card company claimed in Colorado federal court Wednesday that a man obtained counterfeit versions of its "Currency Series 1" cards and attempted to sell them on Facebook.

  • December 17, 2025

    Bill Would Ease Copyright Registration For Visual Artists

    Visual artists would have a simplified and cheaper copyright registration process under a bill introduced Wednesday by Tennessee Republican U.S. Sen. Marsha Blackburn.

  • December 17, 2025

    EFF Loses Fed. Circ. Appeal Over Patent Case Intervention

    The Federal Circuit on Wednesday tossed the Electronic Frontier Foundation's challenge to a Texas federal court's denial of its bid to intervene in a now-settled patent dispute between Entropic and Charter Communications, agreeing the digital rights nonprofit waited too long.

  • December 17, 2025

    Anker, Ugreen Near Peace In Mobile Power Bank Patent Suit

    Electronics-makers Anker and Ugreen have reached a tentative agreement to end Anker's intellectual property claims accusing its rival of infringing a patent for a mobile power bank and marketing "virtually identical" products to consumers.

  • December 17, 2025

    Adobe Infringed Copyrights To Train AI Model, Writer Says

    A writer hit Adobe with a proposed class action in California federal court Tuesday, alleging the software giant illegally used copyrighted books in the "RedPajama" dataset to train its artificial intelligence large-language models, marking the latest development in a wave of litigation over tech companies' use of the controversial dataset.

  • December 17, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Upholds Ax Of Patent From Settled Apple Case

    The Federal Circuit on Wednesday refused to revive a patent for using credit cards on mobile devices, backing the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's finding that Apple was able to prove the patent was invalid.

  • December 17, 2025

    Korean Food Chain Stole Family Spring Roll Recipe, Suit Says

    Korean food conglomerate CJ Group has been accused of stealing a family spring roll recipe that dates to the 1950s and marketing its versions as knockoff frozen spring roll products in a suit seeking $100 million in damages.

  • December 17, 2025

    Fed. Circ. Backs $162K Fee Win For Vizio In Ramey Case

    The Federal Circuit on Wednesday affirmed that a patent owner represented by embattled firm Ramey LLP must pay Walmart Inc.-owned television maker Vizio Inc. nearly $162,000 in attorney fees for bringing a "weak" patent suit and litigating it in an "unreasonable" manner.

  • December 17, 2025

    Circuit-By-Circuit Guide To 2025's Most Memorable Moments

    Federal circuit courts in 2025 strained under a crush of Trump administration lawsuits, as judges directed animated language at litigants and even their fellow judges. And while the president only added a handful of appellate jurists, they had outsize impacts on circuit benches as they joined the cadre of conservatives seated in his first term.

  • December 17, 2025

    Judge Temporarily Blocks German Patent Case Against BMW

    A Texas federal judge has issued a temporary restraining order against a patent company from pursuing legal action against carmaker BMW in German court, after BMW said the company was making an "unprecedented" legal move by pursuing an injunction in German court related to U.S. patents.

  • December 17, 2025

    Judge's Contact With 'Tiger King' Ex-Atty Won't Disqualify Him

    A Tenth Circuit judge on a panel reviewing a copyright infringement claim against Netflix over a video clip included in its "Tiger King" docuseries can stay on the case after inadvertently contacting a former attorney for the plaintiffs, the parties told the appellate court in separate letters.

  • December 17, 2025

    The Top Trademark Decisions Of 2025

    The U.S. Supreme Court vacated a trademark infringement award that reached nearly $47 million and found nonparties couldn't be on the hook for the amount, while the Federal Circuit reproached a trademark tribunal for its handling of a man's attempt to register the F-word. Here are Law360's picks for the biggest trademark decisions of 2025.

  • December 16, 2025

    Patent Attys Ordered To Explain AI-Hallucinated Citations

    A Kansas federal judge ordered the attorneys representing patent licensing company Lexos Media IP in its infringement suit against Overstock.com Inc. to explain why they shouldn't be sanctioned for submitting briefs that contained nonexistent and incorrect legal citations hallucinated by generative artificial intelligence.

  • December 16, 2025

    X Hits Company Behind 'Twitter.New' Site With Trademark Suit

    X Corp. filed suit Tuesday against a company seeking to bring Twitter back, saying in a complaint filed in Delaware federal court that "Twitter never left" and that the trademarks associated with the social media platform remain X's "incontestable intellectual property."

  • December 16, 2025

    Bobcat, Caterpillar, Lawmakers Spar Over Possible Import Ban

    Doosan Bobcat has told the U.S. International Trade Commission to ignore claims by rival Caterpillar Inc. and eight members of Congress that U.S. industry will be harmed by banning imports of Caterpillar construction machines if they are found to infringe Doosan Bobcat patents.

  • December 16, 2025

    Samsung Wants ITC To Consider Oura Smart Ring IP Fight

    Samsung has expanded its legal battle with Oura over patents covering biometric-tracking wearable technologies, telling the U.S. International Trade Commission that Oura's smart rings infringe a set of four patents owned by Samsung.

  • December 16, 2025

    Anthropic Seeks Music Publishers' Claude IP Testing Data

    Anthropic urged a California federal judge during a hearing Tuesday to order music publishers to produce the prompts and outputs their investigators used to test whether the Claude AI chatbot was infringing song lyrics, while the publishers slammed Anthropic's request as an overbroad third attempt to pierce work-product protections.

  • December 16, 2025

    USPTO To Stay Director Reviews For Fed. Circ. Appeals

    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires announced Tuesday that he will pause director review proceedings when the petitioner is also asking the Federal Circuit for relief. 

  • December 16, 2025

    Ultrahuman Loses Bids To Halt ITC Order In Oura Patent Case

    The U.S. International Trade Commission and the Federal Circuit have both denied requests by Ultrahuman to stay ITC orders barring imports of its smart rings found to infringe an Ouraring patent, turning aside Ultrahuman's arguments that the orders are too broad.

  • December 16, 2025

    The Top Copyright Decisions Of 2025

    In watershed moments for copyright law and artificial intelligence, two California federal judges delivered the first rulings on whether AI developers' reliance on copyrighted works to train their models qualifies as fair use, providing initial guidance on contentious battles between content creators and tech companies. Here are Law360's picks for the top copyright rulings of 2025.

  • December 16, 2025

    BMW Seeks Block On 'Unprecedented' German Patent Case

    Carmaker BMW has asked a Texas federal court to block what it called an "unprecedented" attempt to adjudicate U.S. patents in German court by a patent company asserting infringement claims.

Expert Analysis

  • What Ethics Rules Say On Atty Discipline For Online Speech

    Author Photo

    Though law firms are free to discipline employees for their online commentary about Charlie Kirk or other social media activity, saying crude or insensitive things on the internet generally doesn’t subject attorneys to professional discipline under the Model Rules of Professional Conduct, says Stacie H. Rosenzweig at Halling & Cayo.

  • Kimmel 2nd Circ. Victory Holds Novel Copyright Lessons

    Author Photo

    The Second Circuit's recent decision in Santos v. Kimmel, dismissing a copyright infringement claim against Kimmel for airing Cameo videos recorded by former U.S. Rep George Santos, examines the unusual situation of copyrighted works created at the request of the alleged infringer, say attorneys at Venable.

  • Junior Attys Must Beware Of 5 Common Legal Brief Mistakes

    Excerpt from Practical Guidance
    Author Photo

    Junior law firm associates must be careful to avoid five common pitfalls when drafting legal briefs — from including every possible argument to not developing a theme — to build the reputation of a sought-after litigator, says James Argionis at Cozen O'Connor.

  • Demystifying Generative AI For The Modern Juror

    Author Photo

    In cases alleging that the training of artificial intelligence tools violated copyright laws, successful outcomes may hinge in part on the litigator's ability to clearly present AI concepts through a persuasive narrative that connects with ordinary jurors, say Liz Babbitt at IMS Legal Strategies and Devon Madon at GlobalLogic.

  • Series

    Power To The Paralegals: How And Why Training Must Evolve

    Author Photo

    Empowering paralegals through new models of education that emphasize digital fluency, interdisciplinary collaboration and human-centered lawyering could help solve workforce challenges and the justice gap — if firms, educators and policymakers get on board, say Kristine Custodio Suero and Kelli Radnothy.

  • Series

    Playing Softball Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    My time on the softball field has taught me lessons that also apply to success in legal work — on effective preparation, flexibility, communication and teamwork, says Sarah Abrams at Baleen Specialty.

  • And Now A Word From The Panel: Choosing MDL Venues

    Author Photo

    One of the most interesting yet least predictable facets of the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation's practice is venue — namely where the panel decides to place a new MDL proceeding — and its choices reflect the tension between neutrality and case-specific factors, says Alan Rothman at Sidley.

  • Fed. Circ. In August: A Framework For AIA Derivation Disputes

    Author Photo

    In Global Health Solutions v. Selner, the Federal Circuit established how to assess derivation challenges under the America Invents Act's first-to-file system, making it easier for petitioners to determine a challenge's odds of success, say attorneys at Knobbe Martens.

  • USPTO's Track One A Reliable Patent Pathway Amid Backlog

    Author Photo

    As the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office faces a backlog of unexamined utility, plant and reissue patent applications, patent applicants should consider utilizing the USPTO's Track One Program, which not only expedites the process but also increases the likelihood of working with more senior examiners, says Ryan Schermerhorn at Marshall Gerstein.

  • How New Rule On Illustrative Aids Is Faring In Federal Courts

    Author Photo

    In the 10 months since new standards were codified for illustrative aids in federal trials, courts have already begun to clarify the rule's application in different contexts and the rule's boundaries, say attorneys at Bernstein Litowitz.

  • What Novel NIL Suit Reveals About College Sports Landscape

    Author Photo

    A first-of-its-kind name, image and likeness lawsuit — recently filed in Wisconsin state court by the University of Wisconsin-Madison against the University of Miami — highlights new challenges and risks following the NCAA’s landmark agreement to allow schools to make NIL deals and share revenue with student-athletes, say attorneys at O'Melveny.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Mastering Time Management

    Author Photo

    Law students typically have weeks or months to prepare for any given deadline, but the unpredictability of practicing in the real world means that lawyers must become time-management pros, ready to adapt to scheduling conflicts and unexpected assignments at any given moment, says David Thomas at Honigman.

  • How Hyperlinks Are Changing E-Discovery Responsibilities

    Author Photo

    A recent e-discovery dispute over hyperlinked data in Hubbard v. Crow shows how courts have increasingly broadened the definition of control to account for cloud-based evidence, and why organizations must rethink preservation practices to avoid spoliation risks, says Bree Murphy at Exterro.

  • Beaming Up Lessons From William Shatner's Failed Patent Bid

    Author Photo

    In a tale that boldly goes where few celebrity inventors have gone before, William Shatner's unsuccessful attempt to patent a smartphone file organization system offers insights about potential pitfalls to avoid in patent applications, say attorneys at King & Spalding.

  • The Pros And Cons Of Levying Value-Based Fees On Patents

    Author Photo

    The potential for a recurring, value-based maintenance fee on patents, while offering some benefits, raises several complications, including that it would likely exceed the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's statutory authority and reduce research and development activities in the U.S., says Sandip Patel at Marshall Gerstein.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.