Intellectual Property

  • February 09, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Sends Blood Pump Patent Fight Back To Mass.

    The Federal Circuit on Monday reversed a lower court's ruling that Abiomed Inc. hasn't infringed five patents on blood pump systems and methods, while backing the part of the decision that cleared the medical device technology company of allegations it infringed a different patent.

  • February 09, 2026

    'Baby Shark' Ruling Doesn't Stop Google Anti-Phishing Fight

    A Manhattan federal judge granted injunctive relief Monday to Google in its effort to combat an alleged China-based phishing enterprise, holding that faraway defendants were properly served electronically despite an appellate ruling mandating mail service in a "Baby Shark" infringement case.

  • February 09, 2026

    Novo Nordisk Sues Hims & Hers Over Knockoff GLP-1

    Novo Nordisk AS followed through on Monday in Delaware federal court on a plan it announced last week to sue telehealth company Hims & Hers Health Inc. over its marketing of what Novo Nordisk calls a knockoff version of its GLP-1 medications.

  • February 09, 2026

    Intellectual Property Group Of The Year: Susman Godfrey

    Susman Godfrey LLP attorneys in the past year achieved some of the most closely watched victories in copyright, privacy and life sciences, including a record-setting copyright class settlement over books Anthropic obtained to train its flagship artificial intelligence model, earning the firm a spot among the 2025 Law360 Intellectual Property Groups of the Year.

  • February 09, 2026

    High Court Asked To Take Up Malpractice Case Against Akin

    A former Cornell University graduate student wants the U.S. Supreme Court to review the dismissal of his suit accusing Akin Gump Strauss Hauer & Feld LLP attorneys of manipulating patent litigation to steal his DNA sequencing intellectual property.

  • February 06, 2026

    Takeda Can't Ax Most Of Heartburn Drug Pay-For-Delay Suit

    Takeda Pharmaceutical Co. and TWi Pharmaceuticals must face most of a proposed antitrust class action accusing them of delaying the release of the generic version of Takeda's heartburn medication Dexilant, causing Walgreens, Kroger and other retailers to pay more for the brand-name drug, a California federal judge ruled Friday.

  • February 06, 2026

    OpenAI Can Keep Atty Comms Secret After All, Judge Says

    A New York federal judge Friday set aside a magistrate judge's order requiring OpenAI's in-house attorneys to share their internal communications regarding deleted training datasets with authors suing over alleged copyright infringement, holding that the conclusions underlying that decision were "clearly erroneous or contrary to law."

  • February 06, 2026

    HHS Refers Hims & Hers To DOJ Amid Compound Drug Fight

    U.S. Department of Health and Human Services general counsel Mike Stuart announced Friday that his office referred Hims & Hers Health Inc. to the U.S. Department of Justice for investigation, a day after Novo Nordisk A/S threatened litigation over what it called the telehealth company's "knockoff" version of its popular weight loss drug Wegovy.

  • February 06, 2026

    Squires Rules Inconsistent Claim Constructions Doom 3 IPRs

    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has undone three decisions by the Patent Trial and Appeal Board instituting inter partes reviews, finding that the patent challengers made conflicting claim construction arguments in the reviews and in court.

  • February 06, 2026

    'Very Bizarre': Trump's Funding Freeze Appeal Vexes DC Circ.

    D.C. Circuit judges struggled Friday with whether to unblock a federal funding freeze carrying multitrillion-dollar implications, as a Trump administration lawyer disclaimed interest in a vast spending halt but also dodged opportunities to rule it out unequivocally.

  • February 06, 2026

    NJ Judge Tosses Pacira Investor Suit Over Patent Loss

    A New Jersey federal judge on Friday threw out an investor lawsuit against Pacira BioSciences Inc. after a court invalidated a patent for its key pain management drug, ruling that the pharmaceutical company was not required to disclose litigation setbacks it encountered before the final ruling.

  • February 06, 2026

    Tesla, X Accused Of Infringing Voice Assistance Tech Patent

    Tesla Inc., X Corp., and an Indian technology company were all hit with patent infringement lawsuits in Texas federal court over their technology that uses voice assistance.

  • February 06, 2026

    Skating, Twirling And Juggling IP Risk At The Winter Olympics

    Snowboarders, figure skaters, curlers and other competitive athletes have been training for years to be ready for the unexpected at the Winter Olympics, but intellectual property issues arising from taking part in the global sporting event are probably not high on their priority list.

  • February 06, 2026

    PTAB Tosses 2nd Patent On Cologuard Colon Cancer Test

    The Patent Trial and Appeal Board has found that Geneoscopy had shown that all the claims it challenged in a patent on Exact Sciences' colon cancer test Cologuard are invalid as obvious, months after the PTAB invalidated claims in a similar patent.

  • February 06, 2026

    'Cardiac Pack' Wants NC Justices To Revive NIL Suit

    A group of former student-athletes from the early 1980s is urging North Carolina's highest court to revive their name, image and likeness lawsuit against the NCAA, arguing the organization's use of gameplay footage to advertise March Madness is a continuing harm.

  • February 06, 2026

    Tesla, Musk Must Face 'Blade Runner 2049' Copyright Suit

    A Los Angeles federal judge has declined Tesla and Elon Musk's request to throw out a copyright complaint accusing them of using imagery from the movie "Blade Runner 2049" to create a visual for a Tesla promotional event.

  • February 06, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Clears E-Tracking Patents In Apple PTAB Challenge

    The Federal Circuit on Friday rejected Apple's appeal of a Patent Trial and Appeal Board decision that upheld claims in an LBT patent for electronic location tracking.

  • February 06, 2026

    Squires Revives Dish Patent Over Pornhub RPI Error

    U.S. Patent and Trademark Office Director John Squires has vacated the Patent Trial and Appeal Board's invalidation of a Dish Technologies LLC streaming patent, saying it took too long to disclose a real party in interest.

  • February 06, 2026

    Jury Awards $8.4M In Oilfield Trade Secrets Theft Case

    A Texas federal jury has handed an oilfield services company $8.4 million in damages after finding a rival had willfully pilfered trade secrets related to nitrogen rejection unit technology when an employee left to start the rival firm.

  • February 06, 2026

    NH Supreme Court Upholds $23 Million Nokia Oral Deal

    The New Hampshire Supreme Court has affirmed a $23 million award a federal jury granted to Collision Communications against Nokia, representing the amount allegedly agreed upon in an over-the-phone deal made for patent licenses in 2017.

  • February 06, 2026

    Rupp Marine Didn't Infringe Fishing Line Patents, Judge Rules

    A Florida federal judge has ruled that marine supply store Rupp Marine Inc. did not infringe patents owned by Gem Products LLC for line management systems for fishing boats with outriggers.

  • February 06, 2026

    Fed. Circ. Backs Target's Alice Win Over Product Location IP

    The Federal Circuit on Friday refused to revive claims in a series of patents covering ways of finding products within a store, backing a lower court's finding that Target was able to show the claims were invalid under the U.S. Supreme Court's Alice standard.

  • February 06, 2026

    Insulet Gets $14.9M Fee Award For Trade Secret Trial Win

    A Massachusetts federal judge awarded Insulet Corp.'s attorneys almost $15 million for their $452 million jury trial victory in a trade secrets dispute that was later reduced to $59.4 million, but the fees Goodwin Procter LLP netted were significantly less than the nearly $25 million it requested.

  • February 06, 2026

    UK Litigation Roundup: Here's What You Missed In London

    This past week in London saw a unit of Johnson & Johnson sue the U.S. government in a patent dispute, Southampton Football Club file a claim against Aviva Insurance, and an events business face a claim by Live Nation (Music) over potential licensing issues for Chelmsford City Live, a music festival that featured Justin Timberlake last year. Here, Law360 looks at these and other new claims in the U.K.

  • February 05, 2026

    Gilstrap Sends Tesla Patent Case From Texas To Calif.

    A Texas federal judge refused to change his mind — again — about transferring to California a patent infringement suit against Tesla related to technology used in self-driving cars, according to a Jan. 29 order unsealed Thursday.

Expert Analysis

  • Series

    Adapting To Private Practice: From Va. AUSA To Mid-Law

    Author Photo

    Returning to the firm where I began my career after seven years as an assistant U.S. attorney in Virginia has been complex, nuanced and rewarding, and I’ve learned that the pursuit of justice remains the constant, even as the mindset and client change, says Kristin Johnson at Woods Rogers.

  • 2 Fed. Circ. Rulings Underscore Patent Prosecution Pitfalls

    Author Photo

    Two recent patent decisions from the Federal Circuit, overturning significant judgments, serve as reminders that claim modifications and cancellations may have substantive effects on the scope of other claims, and that arguments distinguishing prior art and characterizing claims may also limit claim scope, say attorneys at Morgan Lewis.

  • 7 Document Review Concepts New Attorneys Need To Know

    Author Photo

    For new associates joining firms this fall, stepping into the world of e-discovery can feel like learning a new language, but understanding a handful of fundamentals — from coding layouts to metadata — can help attorneys become fluent in document review, says Ann Motl at Bowman and Brooke.

  • Fed. Circ. Rulings Refine Patent Claim Construction Standards

    Author Photo

    Four Federal Circuit patent decisions this year clarify several crucial principles governing patent claim construction, including the importance of prosecution history, and the need for error-free, precise language from claims drafters, say attorneys at Taft.

  • Avoiding Unforced Evidentiary Errors At Trial

    Author Photo

    To avoid self-inflicted missteps at trial, lawyers must plan their evidentiary strategy as early as their claims and defenses, with an eye toward some of the more common pitfalls, says Nate Sabri at Perkins Coie.

  • How Value-Based Patent Fees May Shape IP Strategies

    Author Photo

    If the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office implements rumored plans to correlate patent fees with patent value, the financial and strategic consequences would largely depend on the specifics of how, when and how often patent values are assessed, say attorneys at Cleary.

  • Agentic AI Puts A New Twist On Attorney Ethics Obligations

    Author Photo

    As lawyers increasingly use autonomous artificial intelligence agents, disciplinary authorities must decide whether attorney responsibility for an AI-caused legal ethics violation is personal or supervisory, and firms must enact strong policies regarding agentic AI use and supervision, says Grace Wynn at HWG.

  • Using Reissue Applications To Strategically Improve Patents

    Author Photo

    Though reissue applications are an often-overlooked consideration in today's patent environment, they can offer powerful tools for correcting errors, strengthening patent protection, or adapting to evolving business and legal landscapes, says Curtis Powell at Wolf Greenfield.

  • Series

    Being A Professional Wrestler Makes Me A Better Lawyer

    Author Photo

    Pursuing my childhood dream of being a professional wrestler has taught me important legal career lessons about communication, adaptability, oral advocacy and professionalism, says Christopher Freiberg at Midwest Disability.

  • Patent Claim Lessons From Fed. Circ.'s Teva Decision

    Author Photo

    The Federal Circuit's recent decision in Janssen v. Teva is an important precedent for parties drafting patent claims or litigating obviousness where the prior art has potentially overlapping ranges for a claimed element, and may be particularly instructive to patent applicants in the pharmaceutical field, say attorneys at Cooley.

  • Series

    Law School's Missed Lessons: Adapting To The Age Of AI

    Author Photo

    Though law school may not have specifically taught us how to use generative artificial intelligence to help with our daily legal tasks, it did provide us the mental building blocks necessary for adapting to this new technology — and the judgment to discern what shouldn’t be automated, says Pamela Dorian at Cozen O'Connor.

  • Ch. 11 Ruling Voiding $2M Litigation Funding Sends A Warning

    Author Photo

    A recent Texas bankruptcy court decision that a postconfirmation litigation trust has no obligations to repay a completely drawn down $2 million litigation funding agreement serves as a warning for estate administrators and funders to properly disclose the intended financing, say attorneys at Kleinberg Kaplan.

  • Future-Proof Patent Law By Starting Talent Pipelines Early

    Author Photo

    Law firms struggling with a narrow talent pipeline in the intellectual property space should consider beginning their recruitment strategies for potential candidates as early as high school, and raise awareness for career opportunities that do not require a law degree, says Christine Hollis at Marshall Gerstein.

  • Demystifying The Civil Procedure Rules Amendment Process

    Author Photo

    Every year, an advisory committee receives dozens of proposals to amend the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, most of which are never adopted — but a few pointers can help maximize the likelihood that an amendment will be adopted, says Josh Gardner at DLA Piper.

  • How USPTO Examiner Memo Informs Software Patent Drafting

    Author Photo

    A memorandum recently released by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office provides useful clues as to how the USPTO and examining corps will evaluate claims in software-implemented inventions for subject matter eligibility going forward, says Michael Lew at Squire Patton.

Want to publish in Law360?


Submit an idea

Have a news tip?


Contact us here
Can't find the article you're looking for? Click here to search the Intellectual Property archive.