Law360 (October 14, 2020, 5:11 PM EDT) -- A number of recent decisions grapple with the concept of comity in English law where there are concurrent English and foreign proceedings, including National Bank of Kazakhstan v. Bank of New York Mellon SA/NV and RiverRock Securities Ltd. v. International Bank of St. Petersburg.
The decisions are a powerful restatement of the flexibility of comity, and a useful reminder that comity might require the English court to exercise judicial restraint, even where its assistance has been sought by foreign courts.
Comity is a concept often relied on by litigants, but rarely analyzed in detail in submission or judgments, and so developments...
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!