HMRC Says AXA Underwriter's Tax Obligations Were Valid

Law360 (April 26, 2021, 5:02 PM EDT) -- The U.K. tax authority hit back against claims by a subsidiary of AXA XL Ltd. that the government was unduly enriched by payments from an underwriter that should have gone to the subsidiary, arguing the underwriter's tax obligations were valid.

In the High Court filing, dated April 19 and recently made public, HM Revenue & Customs disputed XL Insurance Co. SE's position that the amounts paid by underwriter Paul Alan Corcoran to HMRC should have been paid to XL instead. XL is suing Corcoran, sole shareholder and director of Ipors Underwriting Ltd., which acted as XL's agent from 2012 to 2016,...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!