Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

In re Apple iPhone Antitrust Litigation

Track this case

Case overview

Case Number:

4:11-cv-06714

See also:

Court:

California Northern

Nature of Suit:

Anti-Trust

Multi Party Litigation:

Class Action

Judge:

Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers

Firms

Companies

Sectors & Industries:

  1. August 23, 2019

    Judge Links Consumer, Developer Suits Over Apple App Store

    A California federal judge has linked the proposed consumer class action targeting Apple's App Store practices that went up to the U.S. Supreme Court with a pair of suits filed by app developers, saying they all involve the same types of transactions.

  2. July 16, 2019

    No New Judge For IPhone Users In App Store Case

    The Ninth Circuit on Tuesday refused to reassign a proposed class action from consumers alleging Apple Inc. monopolizes the App Store market as the case returns from a trip to the U.S. Supreme Court.

  3. June 28, 2019

    Calif. Judge Leans Toward Linking Apple App Store Suits

    The California federal judge overseeing a proposed class action from consumers alleging Apple is monopolizing the App Store market said in an order Thursday that despite objections she was inclined to relate the case to one being brought by app developers, but would give the parties another chance to weigh in.

  4. June 27, 2019

    IPhone Users Want Their Own Suit Over App Store 'Monopoly'

    Neither app developers nor iPhone users want to face Apple jointly in California federal court with allegations that the technology giant is illegally monopolizing the App Store market, as the consumers argued Wednesday that the U.S. Supreme Court demonstrated how different the groups are.

  5. June 26, 2019

    App Developers Want Apple Antitrust Suits Kept Separate

    Developers accusing Apple of illegally monopolizing the App Store market told a California federal judge on Tuesday that their case is too different from the proposed consumer class action recently kept alive by the U.S. Supreme Court to warrant relating them.

  6. June 24, 2019

    Apple Looks To Link Developer, Consumer Antitrust Suits

    Apple Inc. urged a California federal court Friday to relate a suit from developers accusing the tech giant of monopolizing the distribution of apps on its devices to the consumer case the U.S. Supreme Court ruled on last month.

  7. June 20, 2019

    After High Court Win, IPhone Users Want New Judge

    IPhone users heading back to district court say they want to start fresh with a new judge after the U.S. Supreme Court last month permitted them to bring antitrust claims against Apple Inc.

  8. December 02, 2013

    Apple Escapes App Store Monopoly Suit

    A California federal judge on Monday threw out a case accusing Apple Inc. of illegally monopolizing the market for iPhone apps, ruling the would-be class members lacked standing to sue over the 30 percent commission the company charges developers in its App Store.

  9. October 01, 2013

    App Store Monopoly Claims Don't Add Up, Apple Says

    Apple Inc. urged a California federal judge on Monday to dismiss an iPhone customer class action over the tech giant's alleged illegal monopoly of the iPhone aftermarket through its App Store, arguing the plaintiffs haven't proven their standing to sue Apple instead of the third-party developers.

  10. September 06, 2013

    IPhone Users Take Another Crack At Monopoly Suit

    A group of iPhone users on Thursday renewed class action claims against Apple Inc. in a bid to avoid having its suit dismissed again, adding details to its allegations that the company illegally monopolized the phone's aftermarket when it created its App Store.