Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Dennis et al v. JPMorgan Chase & Co. et al

  1. May 25, 2023

    Attys Get $37M For Landing Forex Rigging Deals

    A New York federal judge awarded $36.8 million in attorney fees to counsel for investors who accused a group of banks of rigging foreign exchange markets, about $10.4 million less than the lawyers wanted, for securing nearly $186 million in settlements for their clients.

  2. August 19, 2022

    3 Firms Want $47M For Landing Forex Rigging Deals

    Attorneys who secured settlements totaling nearly $186 million on behalf of investors who accused a group of banks of rigging foreign exchange markets have asked a Manhattan federal judge for more than $47 million for their work on the case.

  3. May 02, 2022

    Credit Suisse, 5 Others Settle Australian Forex Rigging Suit

    Credit Suisse and five additional financial institutions have reached agreements to settle investor claims that they conspired to rig the derivatives market using an Australian foreign exchange benchmark, resolving allegations against all the remaining defendants in the sprawling case and bringing the settlement total for the action to nearly $186 million.

  4. December 14, 2021

    Morgan Stanley, 3 Others Ink $104M Deal In Rigging Case

    Four banks including Morgan Stanley have agreed to pay a combined $104 million to settle claims that they conspired to rig the price of derivatives based on an Australian foreign exchange benchmark.

  5. March 02, 2021

    Aussie Bank Westpac Inks $25M Deal In Rate-Rigging Suit

    Australian bank Westpac has agreed to a $25 million deal settling claims that it conspired with a cabal of banking institutions to rig the price of derivatives based on an Australian foreign exchange benchmark.

  6. August 05, 2020

    Aussie Banks Can't Duck Rate-Rigging Suit

    A New York federal judge on Tuesday doubled down on his decision to keep two Australian banks as defendants in a proposed class action alleging manipulation of Australia's benchmark interest rate, refusing to dismiss them alongside seven other banks.

  7. February 28, 2020

    Aussie Banks Say They Should Exit Rate-Rigging Suit Too

    Two Australian banks claim they should've been among the seven banks dismissed in mid-February from a proposed class action alleging manipulation of Australia's benchmark interest rate.

  8. February 14, 2020

    Aussie Rate-Rigging Suit Cut To 1 Plaintiff, 9 Banks In NY

    A New York federal judge waxed poetic on Thursday describing an Australian benchmark interest rate-rigging suit that, like a bar-tailed godwit flying 7,000 miles from Australia to Alaska, has once again flocked to the U.S. despite a series of obstacles.

  9. May 21, 2019

    Aussie Benchmark Fixing Suit Is Still Broken, Banks Say

    A dozen major banks said Monday that the amended complaint filed by investors over the alleged rigging of an Australian benchmark interest rate fails to fix the jurisdictional issues that have plagued the antitrust case thus far.

  10. December 11, 2018

    Final Parties In Aussie Benchmark Suit Want Dismissals Redo

    An investor, Morgan Stanley and RBC Capital Markets LLC, the only remaining parties in a lawsuit accusing 15 major banks and two brokers of conspiring to manipulate the price of derivatives based on an Australian benchmark interest rate, each separately asked a New York federal judge Monday to reconsider his recent decision to dismiss most of the claims.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!