Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Baker et al v. Bank of America Corporation et al
Case Number:
1:16-cv-07512
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action
Judge:
Firms
- Berger Montague
- Cahill Gordon
- Cleary Gottlieb
- Covington & Burling
- Davis Polk
- Gibson Dunn
- Hausfeld LLP
- Kirkland & Ellis
- Latham & Watkins
- Linklaters
- Locke Lord
- McCulley McCluer
- Moore & Van Allen
- Paul Weiss
- Schneider Wallace
- Shearman & Sterling
- Sidley Austin
- Skadden Arps
- Wachtell Lipton
Companies
- Bank of America Corp.
- Barclays PLC
- BNP Paribas SA
- Citigroup Inc.
- Credit Suisse Group AG
- Deutsche Bank AG
- HSBC Holdings PLC
- JPMorgan Chase & Co.
- Morgan Stanley
- RBC Capital Markets
- Societe Generale
- Standard Chartered PLC
- The Goldman Sachs Group Inc.
- The Royal Bank of Scotland Group PLC
- UBS Group AG
Sectors & Industries:
-
January 24, 2017
Banks Look To Escape Indirect Purchasers' Forex Suit
Foreign and domestic banks accused of rigging the foreign exchange market told a New York federal court Monday that the court doesn’t have jurisdiction over some of them and that the indirect purchasers of financial products who brought a putative class action aren’t active in the allegedly affected market.
-
September 27, 2016
Big Banks Hit With Forex Price-Fixing Class Action
Every bank accused of rigging the foreign exchange market in ongoing litigation in the Southern District of New York was sued on Monday over the same issue in the same court, this time by a putative class of people who bought foreign exchange-linked shares indirectly.