Try our Advanced Search for more refined results

Litovich v. Bank Of America Corporation et al

  1. November 14, 2022

    Judge Won't Revisit Conflict Issue In 'Odd Lots' Case

    A New York federal judge has refused to grant investors accusing big banks of rigging corporate bonds a redo after the prior judge overseeing the case was replaced over a spousal stock ownership conflict.

  2. April 28, 2022

    Big Banks Say 'Odd Lots' Judge Had No Conflict At Dismissal

    Big banks that were freed from a corporate bond-rigging suit by a judge who has since been replaced over a spousal stock ownership conflict have urged the judge's successor to let an appeal of the dismissed case play out in the Second Circuit rather than tee up a do-over.

  3. March 03, 2022

    Class Seeks Bond-Rigging Suit Redo After Judge's Recusal

    A group of investors claiming big banks colluded to rig corporate bond prices will seek to revive their proposed class action, after the New York federal judge who dismissed the case recused himself because his wife owns stock in one of the defendants, Bank of America.

  4. February 25, 2022

    Clerk Says Judge Shouldn't Have Heard BofA Spoofing Case

    A New York federal judge who freed Bank of America and other financial institutions from a consolidated shareholder class action over alleged spoofing in the precious metals futures market should have recused himself from the case because his wife owned Bank of America stock, according to a Friday letter from a court clerk.

  5. October 25, 2021

    Big Banks Beat Investors' Odd-Lot Bonds Antitrust Suit

    A New York federal judge on Monday handed a big win to Bank of America, Wells Fargo, JPMorgan Chase and several other big banks, throwing out for good a proposed class action accusing them of colluding to rig prices for smaller trades of corporate bonds.

  6. January 29, 2021

    Big Banks 'Sow Confusion' In Small Bond Suit, Investors Say

    Retail investors suing Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and several other big banks for allegedly hitting them with inflated prices and lower returns for corporate bonds on Thursday said a New York federal judge should reject the bid to toss the case that "deliberately attempts to sow confusion."

  7. December 16, 2020

    Banks Go Back To Mat Against Odd-Lot Bonds Antitrust Suit

    Bank of America, JPMorgan Chase and other banking giants have renewed their push in New York federal court to torpedo a proposed class action accusing them of colluding to rig prices for smaller trades of corporate bonds, saying the latest version of the case is still "impossibly broad" and "legally insufficient."

  8. September 11, 2020

    Big Banks Call Small Bond Conspiracy Suit 'Impossibly Broad'

    Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, Wells Fargo and a slew of other megabanks asked a New York federal judge to dismiss an antitrust suit, saying it alleges two "impossibly broad conspiracies" to hit retail investors with inflated prices and lower returns for corporate bonds.

  9. April 21, 2020

    Banks Kept Billions From Small Bond Traders, Suit Says

    A Puerto Rico woman hit 10 big banks including Citigroup, Goldman Sachs and Wells Fargo with an antitrust suit Tuesday in Manhattan federal court, claiming they conspired to hit small investors with higher buying prices and lower returns for corporate bonds, costing them billions of dollars.

Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!