Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:21-md-02981
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Winston & Strawn
- Willkie Farr
- Altair Law
- Bartlit Beck
- Faegre Drinker
- Gustafson Gluek
- Tostrud Law Group
- A&O Shearman
- Berger Montague
- Morgan Lewis
- Kaplan Fox
- Cravath Swaine
- Forman Watkins
- Stradling Yocca
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Covington & Burling
- Zelle LLP
- Wilson Sonsini
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Korein Tillery
- Pritzker Levine
- Fox Rothschild
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Hogan Lovells
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Hueston Hennigan
- Tyz Law Group
- Scott&Scott
- Barrett Law Group
- Milberg Coleman
- Hausfeld LLP
- Schonbrun Seplow
- Hadsell Stormer
- Benedict Law Group
- Kwun Bhansali
- Munger Tolles
- Venable LLP
- DiCello Levitt
- Ellis George
- Hagens Berman
- Quinn Emanuel
- Williams & Connolly
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Frederick M. Lehrer Attorney at Law
- Mantese Honigman
- Foley & Lardner
- Keller Rohrback
- Gibson Dunn
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- Sidley Austin
- McManis Faulkner
- Cotchett Pitre
- Miller Barondess
- Dechert LLP
- Annaguey McCann
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Sperling Kenny
- Kirby McInerney
- Saveri & Saveri
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- American Antitrust Institute
- Hulu LLC
- Apple Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- TikTok Inc.
- Riot Games Inc.
- Match Group LLC
- Netflix Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Epic Games Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Google LLC
- Sony Group Corp.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Bumble Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Big Fish Games Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Activision Blizzard Inc.
- Alphabet Inc.
- Electronic Arts Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- The Walt Disney Co.
Government Agencies
- State of Indiana
- State of Nevada
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Tennessee
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Michigan
Sectors & Industries:
-
June 25, 2024
Google Says Epic's Play Store Changes Could Cost $137M
Google urged a California federal judge Monday to reject Epic Games' proposed Play Store remedies following Epic Games' antitrust jury trial win, arguing that the changes could cost up to $137 million plus ongoing maintenance costs and create new security risks while potentially harming Google's reputation.
-
May 23, 2024
'I Just Don't Buy It': Judge Rips Google's Injunction Argument
A California federal judge considering the scope of a potential injunction against Google following Epic Games' antitrust jury trial win told Google's economist Thursday that the tech giant keeps arguing that more app store options for consumers will create a "terrifying world of chaos and anarchy," but "I just don't buy it."
-
May 03, 2024
Google Blasts Epic's Post-Verdict Play Store Reforms Bid
Google is hitting back at Epic Games' proposed injunction following its jury win on antitrust claims related to the Google Play Store and Android apps, telling a California federal judge Thursday that Epic's proposed rules cover conduct that was not presented to the jury and is "purely hypothetical."
-
May 02, 2024
Google Judge Ponders Search Engine's Might At Trial Closings
The quality of Google's search engine, and what it would take to actually challenge the company's grip on default placements on Apple browsers and Android phones, were top of mind Thursday for the D.C. federal judge weighing U.S. Department of Justice monopolization allegations.
-
April 18, 2024
AGs, Google Defend $700M Play Store Deal Ripped By Judge
A group of state attorneys general and Google defended the proposed $700 million settlement both sides brokered in the states' antitrust suit against the company in December, telling a San Francisco federal judge that the deal is consistent with Ninth Circuit precedent and releases only a limited set of claims against Google for a seven-year period.
-
April 12, 2024
Epic Wants Google Play Store Reforms After Antitrust Verdict
Following Epic Games' jury win on antitrust claims related to the Google Play Store and Android apps, the "Fortnite" maker has asked a California federal judge to force Google to allow consumers to download apps from wherever they want and bar the tech giant from restricting in-app purchase options.
-
March 13, 2024
Google Calls DOJ's 'Fake Privilege' Docs Citation 'Misleading'
The D.C. federal judge weighing the fate of Google's search business should pay no heed to discussions, cited by the Justice Department, from company lawyers in a separate case of "fake privilege" hiding otherwise discoverable evidence, Google has said.
-
February 29, 2024
Epic, Google Are At App Store Antitrust Remedies 'Impasse'
Epic Games Inc. and Google LLC told a California federal judge on Wednesday that they are at an impasse over the potential changes Google will have to make following the Fortnite game developer's jury trial win on antitrust claims related to Google Play Store and Android apps.
-
February 28, 2024
Google Attys' 'Fake Privilege' Comments Cited In Search Suit
The U.S. Justice Department and states accusing Google of monopolizing the online-search market have asked a D.C. federal judge to consider internal chats disclosed in Epic Games' antitrust lawsuit that revealed Google's lawyers discussing "fake privilege" — a practice of unnecessarily involving a lawyer to make an exchange confidential.
-
February 26, 2024
Google Judge Rips $700M Antitrust Deal: 'It's Not Great'
A California federal judge lambasted a $700 million deal that consumers and state attorneys general struck with Google blocking antitrust claims related to Android apps and the Play Store for 127 million consumers for the next seven years, saying Monday he's "never granted prospective relief" and that plaintiffs "folded" with "four aces."