Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
In re: Google Play Store Antitrust Litigation
Case Number:
3:21-md-02981
Court:
Nature of Suit:
Multi Party Litigation:
Class Action, Multi-district Litigation
Judge:
Firms
- Winston & Strawn
- Willkie Farr
- Altair Law
- Bartlit Beck
- Faegre Drinker
- Gustafson Gluek
- Tostrud Law Group
- A&O Shearman
- Berger Montague
- Morgan Lewis
- Kaplan Fox
- Cravath Swaine
- Forman Watkins
- Stradling Yocca
- Paul Hastings
- Paul Weiss
- Covington & Burling
- Zelle LLP
- Wilson Sonsini
- McDermott Will & Schulte
- Korein Tillery
- Pritzker Levine
- Fox Rothschild
- Cuneo Gilbert
- Hogan Lovells
- Joseph Saveri Law Firm
- Hueston Hennigan
- Tyz Law Group
- Scott&Scott
- Barrett Law Group
- Milberg Coleman
- Hausfeld LLP
- Schonbrun Seplow
- Hadsell Stormer
- Benedict Law Group
- Kwun Bhansali
- Munger Tolles
- Venable LLP
- DiCello Levitt
- Ellis George
- Hagens Berman
- Quinn Emanuel
- Williams & Connolly
- Sullivan & Cromwell
- Frederick M. Lehrer Attorney at Law
- Mantese Honigman
- Foley & Lardner
- Keller Rohrback
- Gibson Dunn
- O'Melveny & Myers
- Davis Polk
- Sidley Austin
- McManis Faulkner
- Cotchett Pitre
- Miller Barondess
- Dechert LLP
- Annaguey McCann
- Keker Van Nest & Peters
- Sperling Kenny
- Kirby McInerney
- Saveri & Saveri
- Milbank LLP
Companies
- American Antitrust Institute
- Hulu LLC
- Apple Inc.
- Microsoft Corp.
- T-Mobile US Inc.
- TikTok Inc.
- Riot Games Inc.
- Match Group LLC
- Netflix Inc.
- Motorola Mobility LLC
- Epic Games Inc.
- Samsung Electronics Co. Ltd.
- Google LLC
- Sony Group Corp.
- Spotify Technology SA
- Nintendo Co. Ltd.
- Bumble Inc.
- EE Ltd.
- Big Fish Games Inc.
- Valve Corp.
- Activision Blizzard Inc.
- Alphabet Inc.
- Electronic Arts Inc.
- Warner Bros. Entertainment Inc.
- Amazon.com Inc.
- Warner Bros. Discovery Inc.
- The Walt Disney Co.
Government Agencies
- State of Indiana
- State of Nevada
- Commonwealth of Massachusetts
- State of Tennessee
- Commonwealth of Kentucky
- U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia
- State of Maryland
- State of Michigan
Sectors & Industries:
-
April 20, 2023
Antitrust Judge Won't Delay Nov. Google Play Store Trial
A California federal judge denied on Thursday Google's request to delay a jury trial to await the outcome of its appeal of an order certifying a 21 million consumer class in sprawling antitrust litigation over allegations Google monopolizes its Android Play Store, saying repeatedly that the November jury trial "is happening."
-
March 28, 2023
Google Sanctioned For Chat Deletion In App Store Suit
A California federal judge sanctioned Google on Tuesday for failing to preserve evidence in multidistrict litigation from state attorneys general and private plaintiffs suing over its control of the Android phone app-distribution market, faulting the search giant for a default policy to delete internal chats after 24 hours.
-
March 17, 2023
Google Wants Play Store Trial To Wait For Class Cert. Appeal
Google asked a California federal court to put off trial in the pending cases accusing the company of monopolizing the distribution of apps on Android devices until after a ruling on its appeal of an order certifying a consumer class.
-
March 15, 2023
Enforcers Say Recovered Chats Show Google Hid Evidence
State-level enforcers and other plaintiffs escalated their accusations that Google deliberately destroyed evidence by deleting internal chats among employees, claiming in a supplemental brief that the conspiracy goes all the way to the "very top."
-
February 03, 2023
Google's Antitrust Trouble Is Piling Up
The U.S. Department of Justice's Jan. 24 suit seeking to break up Google's advertising business adds to a mountain of antitrust litigation already targeting the tech giant. In addition to federal enforcement, Google is also facing cases from dozens of state-level enforcers, as well as from developers, advertisers and consumers, all accusing it of monopolizing various digital markets.
-
January 31, 2023
'Why Did You Sit On This?' Judge Slams Google Over Chats
A California federal judge appeared open Tuesday to sanctioning Google for failing to preserve employees' online chats in high-stakes litigation alleging the tech giant monopolizes the Android app distribution market, saying Google should have disclosed the practice and asking its lawyers, "Why didn't you tell anyone? Why did you sit on this?"
-
January 30, 2023
Google Has Deliberately Deleted Chats For Years, Court Told
State-level enforcers and others suing Google for monopolization over its Play Store policies told a California federal court that the tech giant has been deliberately deleting internal company chats for years and is asking for a slap on the wrist as punishment for destroying evidence.
-
January 25, 2023
Google Says Its Doc Retention Sours Play Store Sanctions Bid
Google has hit back against a motion for sanctions claiming that it failed to preserve significant evidence from its employees' online chats in a case accusing it of unlawfully monopolizing the Android app distribution and in-app payment market, stating that it has taken "multiple steps" to preserve "potentially relevant information."
-
January 12, 2023
Google Can't 'Get Away' With Deleting Chats, Judge Says
A California federal judge on Thursday criticized Google after learning the tech giant may not have preserved evidence from its employees' online chats in a case accusing the company of violating antitrust law, saying if true, "I'm not going to let Google get away with this" without a "substantial, trial-related penalty."
-
January 02, 2023
Antitrust Conduct Issues And Cases To Watch In 2023
The Federal Trade Commission prepares to test the limits of its authority to combat unfair methods of competition in the coming year, as the U.S. Department of Justice and state enforcers continue pushing aggressive antitrust agendas alongside new proposed class actions from private parties.