Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Lexmark International Inc.
-
Utility | Filed: February 26, 2024 | Entered: February 26, 2024 Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Patent | Colorado
Terminate Civil Case - PUBLIC
Civil Case Terminated pursuant to 38 notice of dismissal on 2/16/2024. Text Only Entry (norlin, )
-
Order | Filed: February 26, 2024 | Entered: February 26, 2024 Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Patent | Colorado
Order on Motion for Sanctions
MINUTE ORDER: Consistent with the Court's February 16, 2024, Minute Order, see [Doc. 39], the 20 Lexmark International, Inc.'s Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions is DENIED AS MOOT and the Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/26/2024.(nywlc5, )
-
Order | Filed: February 16, 2024 | Entered: February 16, 2024 Ortiz & Associates Consulting, LLC v. Lexmark International, Inc.
Patent | Colorado
Minute Order
MINUTE ORDER: Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Ortiz & Associates Consulting LLC's 38 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed on February 16, 2024. Dismissal pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) is appropriate because Defendant Lexmark International, Inc. has not answered or filed a motion for summary judgment. However, it is clear that the voluntary dismissal of this action does not deprive the Court of jurisdiction to consider sanctions under Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Cooter & Gell v. Hartmarx Corp., 496 U.S. 384, 395 (1990) (holding that district courts may enforce Rule 11 even after the plaintiff has filed a notice of dismissal under Rule 41(a)(1)). Despite the fact that Plaintiff referenced a settlement in its previously filed 35 Unopposed Motion to Stay All Deadlines, it is not clear based on the record before the Court whether Defendant seeks to proceed with its 20 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions, or whether such motion is appropriately denied as moot. Accordingly, no later than February 21, 2024, Defendant shall file a Notice with the Court informing it of Defendant's position with respect to the pending 20 Motion for Rule 11 Sanctions. Failure to file such Notice shall be construed by this Court as consent to deny the Motion as moot. By Judge Nina Y. Wang on 02/16/2024. Text Only Entry (nywlc5, )
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login