Case Activity (741)

1. Motion | Filed: July 14, 2026 | Entered: July 14, 2026 Shell Trademark Management B.V. v. The Individuals ans Business Entities Identified on Schedule A

   Trademark | New York Eastern

   Report and Recommendations

   REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS. For the reasons above, the undersigned recommends that Oil Depots Motion for Sanctions be denied without prejudice as premature.
   
   Because the undersigned recommends denying the Motion without prejudice as premature (and thus does not determine the propriety of sanctioning Shell at the end of this litigation), Shells request for attorneys fees related to opposing the Motion also should be denied without prejudice. See ECF No. 168-1 at 3132; see also China AI Cap. Ltd. v. DLA Piper LLP (US), No. 21-CV-10911, 2025 WL 3204368, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Nov. 17, 2025) (Rule 11 allows, but does not require, the district court to award a prevailing party the reasonable expenses and attorneys fees incurred in presenting or opposing the motion. (internal quotation marks and citations omitted)); Marquess v. Cardflex, Inc., No. 19-CV-04790, 2023 WL 3597601, at *2 (E.D.N.Y. May 23, 2023) (Although a prevailing non-movant may be entitled to attorneys fees when he successfully avoids Rule 11 sanctions, fees are infrequently granted where the motion was not clearly frivolous, filed for an improper purpose, or not well grounded in fact or law. (citation omitted)).
   
   Consistent with the undersigneds recommendation to deny the Motion without prejudice as premature, the undersigned additionally recommends that the associated Motions to Seal (ECF Nos. 168 , 169 ), which provide boilerplate arguments without delineating the parties respective positions on proposed sealing and redactions to their sanctions motion briefing, be denied without prejudice. Electronic Order, dated February 25, 2026; see also Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Wales LLC, 993 F. Supp. 2d 409, 414 (S.D.N.Y. 2014) (declining to seal a reinsurance agreement based on boilerplate statements made in a supporting declaration). Objections to R&R due by 7/28/2026. SO Ordered by Magistrate Judge Lee G. Dunst on 7/14/2026. (CT)

2. Misc | Filed: July 08, 2026 | Entered: July 08, 2026 The Commonwealth of Pennsylvania V. Exxon Mobil Corporation, ET AL.

   Environmental Matters | New York Southern

   Rule 7.1 Corporate Disclosure Statement

   AMENDED RULE 7.1 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT. Identifying Corporate Parent ExxonMobil Holdings Corporation for Exxon Mobil Corporation; Corporate Parent Mobil Corporation for Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation; Corporate Parent Exxon Mobil Corporation for Mobil Oil Corporation. Document filed by Exxon Mobil Corporation, Exxon Mobil Oil Corporation, Mobil Oil Corporation..(Pardo, James)

3. 739 additional result(s)