Case Activity (221)

1. Order | Filed: July 13, 2026 | Entered: July 13, 2026 Dolmas v. Vitalant, Inc.

   Civil Rights: Jobs | Colorado

   Order on Motion for TRO

   ORDER The matter before the Court is Plaintiff's Renewed Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order and Preliminary Injunction to Preserve the Status Quo and Enjoin Defendant from Enforcing or Requiring Execution of Mandatory Arbitration Agreement (the "Motion"). [#17] Through the Motion, Plaintiff seeks an Order prohibiting Defendant from terminating Plaintiff for refusing to sign a mandatory arbitration agreement. Notably, Plaintiff appears to continue to work for Defendant, yet Plaintiff has not served Defendant and seeks an ex parte remedy. As an ex parte remedy, the circumstances justifying the issuance of temporary restraining order are "extremely limited." Reno Air Racing Ass'n., Inc. v. McCord, 452 F.3d 1126, 1131 (9th Cir. 2006) (citing Granny Goose Foods, Inc. v. Bhd. of Teamsters & Auto Truck Drivers Local No. 70 of Alameda Cty., 415 U.S. 423, 439 (1974) ("The stringent restrictions imposed by... Rule 65 on the availability of ex parte temporary restraining orders reflect the fact that our entire jurisprudence runs counter to the notion of court action taken before reasonable notice and an opportunity to be heard has been granted both sides of a dispute." (footnote omitted))). For example, an ex parte temporary restraining order may be appropriate where "notice to the adverse party is impossible either because the identity of the adverse party is unknown or because a known party cannot be located in time for a hearing," or where "notice to the defendant would render fruitless the further prosecution of the action." Id. at 1130-31. Plaintiff has made no such showing. Accordingly, the Motion is DENIED. SO ORDERED, by Magistrate Judge Scott T. Varholak on 7/13/2026. For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. Text Only Entry(stvlc6, )

2. Order | Filed: July 07, 2026 | Entered: July 08, 2026 Corke (PS) v. Vitalant, Inc.

   Civil Rights: Jobs | Colorado

   Minute Order

   MINUTE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Richard T. Gurley on 7/7/2026. Plaintiff's "Motion for 30-day Extension of Time to File Second Amended Complaint and Request for Clarification" (ECF No. 8 ), filed out of time, is GRANTED as follows.
   
   Plaintiff shall comply with the May 6, 2026 Order to File Second Amended Employment Discrimination Complaint (ECF No. 7 ) within thirty days of the date of this Minute Order. This action may be dismissed without further notice if Plaintiff fails to comply with the order to amend within the time allowed.
   
   For all non-e-filer pro se parties, a copy of this document has been sent via U.S. Mail to the mailing address of record. (ccuen, )

3. 219 additional result(s)