Try our Advanced Search for more refined results
Wix.com Inc.
-
Misc | Filed: May 08, 2024 | Entered: May 08, 2024 FingerMotion, Inc. v. Capybara Research et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Letter
LETTER addressed to Judge John P. Cronan from Waleed Amer dated May 8, 2024 re: Response to Court Order dated April 24, 2024. Document filed by FingerMotion, Inc...(Amer, Waleed)
-
Notice | Filed: May 08, 2024 | Entered: May 08, 2024 FingerMotion, Inc. v. Capybara Research et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Notice of Voluntary Dismissal
NOTICE OF VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL pursuant to Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(i) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, the plaintiff(s) and or their counsel(s), hereby give notice that the above-captioned action is voluntarily dismissed, without prejudice against the defendant(s) Igor Appelboom, Capybara Research. Document filed by FingerMotion, Inc.. Proposed document to be reviewed and processed by Clerk's Office staff (No action required by chambers)...(Amer, Waleed)
-
Order | Filed: April 24, 2024 FingerMotion, Inc. v. Capybara Research et al
Securities/Commodities | New York Southern
Order
ORDER Plaintiff filed a motion for default judgment against Defendant Capybara Research on December 27, 2023. Dkts. 28-32. Since then, Plaintiff amended its Complaint to, inter alia, add Igor Appelboom as a defendant. Dkt. 34. On January 8, 2024, in her order allowing that amendment, the Honorable Katharine H. Parker, to whom this case is referred for general pretrial supervision, also ordered that Plaintiff must first attempt to obtain Appelbooms waiver of service and attempt service thr ough Brazil's Central Authority pursuant to the Hague Convention. Dkt. 33 at 6. It appears from the docket that no summons has been sought or obtained as to Appelboom. By May 8, 2024, Plaintiff shall file a letter of no longer than three pages advising the Court as to what efforts have been made to effect service on Appelboom in accordance with Judge Parkers January 8 order, including whether a summons for Appelboom has been sought and obtained from the Clerk of the Court and whether P laintiff has made contact with Appelboom via email to seek waiver of service as discussed in Judge Parkers order. Plaintiff should also address why this Court should not deny the motion for default judgment as to Capybara Research without prejudic e to renewal after Plaintiffs claims against Appelboom are resolvedor, if appropriate, without prejudice to a motion for default judgment against both Defendants if Appelboom fails to appear after service-given the preference to proceed in this ma nner to avoid inconsistent findings of liability. See City of Almaty v. Sater, No. 19 Civ. 2645 (AJN), 2021 WL 4340541, at *1 (S.D.N.Y. Sept. 23, 2021) ("Default judgment cannot be issued where the relief requested would prejudice actively litigating defendants. The key inquiry is whether the default judgment could result in inconsistent outcomes for similarly situated defendants." (cleaned up)). SO ORDERED. (Signed by Judge John P. Cronan on 4/24/2024) (jca)
Stay ahead of the curve
In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.
- Archive of over 450,000 articles
- Database of over 2.1 million cases
- 62,000+ organization-specific pages.
- Daily and real-time news and case alerts on organizations, industries, and customized search queries.
- Significant legal events involving law firms, companies, industries, and government agencies.
- Learn more
TRY LAW360 FREE FOR SEVEN DAYS
Already a subscriber? Click here to login