When Shareholders Can Bring Direct Claims In Cayman Court

Law360 (August 27, 2019, 1:42 PM EDT) -- This article considers two recent Cayman court decisions, David Xiaoying Gao v. China Biologic and Primeo Fund v. HSBC, which highlight the very limited situations in which a shareholder may bring a direct claim against a director or a third party and therefore the importance of ensuring that claims are commenced by the proper plaintiff.

Foss v. Harbottle[1] establishes the general rule that in any action in which a wrong is alleged to have been done to a company, the proper claimant is the company itself and no separate cause of action arises in favor of a shareholder. The shareholder’s loss...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!