DPD Drivers Lose Bid For Employee Status At Tribunal Appeal

By Lucia Osborne-Crowley (December 21, 2021, 11:21 PM GMT) -- Two DPD delivery drivers lost their bid on Tuesday to overturn a ruling that they were not employees of the company because under their contracts they are free to substitute themselves for other drivers. 

Naomi Ellenbogen QC, a judge on the Employment Appeal Tribunal, dismissed an appeal from the two DPD drivers against a ruling in the lower tribunal that they are not proper employees because their contracts with DPD allow them to make substitutes between different drivers carrying out different jobs. 

This freedom to substitute drivers goes against the idea of so-called personal performance in an employer-employee relationship — that...

Stay ahead of the curve

In the legal profession, information is the key to success. You have to know what’s happening with clients, competitors, practice areas, and industries. Law360 provides the intelligence you need to remain an expert and beat the competition.

  • Access to case data within articles (numbers, filings, courts, nature of suit, and more.)
  • Access to attached documents such as briefs, petitions, complaints, decisions, motions, etc.
  • Create custom alerts for specific article and case topics and so much more!


Hello! I'm Law360's automated support bot.

How can I help you today?

For example, you can type:
  • I forgot my password
  • I took a free trial but didn't get a verification email
  • How do I sign up for a newsletter?
Ask a question!